Firearms Transactions and Straw Purchases
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Firearms Transactions and Straw Purchases
- Posted
- May 6, 2026
- Comment period
- May 6, 2026 – Aug 5, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08922
- CFR
- 27 CFR Part 478
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 25, 2026Cool F/XSupportBusiness
A Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) supports the proposed rule to distinguish straw purchases from lawful gifts but requests more concrete examples of common scenarios to ensure dealers are not unfairly penalized for processing honest family transactions. The commenter emphasizes that a customer's statement of a gift should not, by itself, create reasonable cause to suspect a crime.
Read comment → - Jun 24, 2026Silencer Central / BANISH SuppressorsSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
The CEO of Silencer Central / BANISH Suppressors, a Federal Firearms Licensee, supports the proposed rule to codify straw purchasing laws into a single regulatory section. The commenter argues that the rule provides much-needed clarity but requests three specific refinements regarding age terminology, family relationship exclusions, and spousal payment conditions to ensure the rule is easily administrable at the point of sale.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Michael DeibertSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Mike SnyderSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
Roger Grubb, a private citizen, opposes the proposed rule on the grounds that it exceeds the ATF's statutory authority, creates arbitrary cohabitation requirements for spouses, and lacks clarity regarding "consideration." He argues the rule creates constitutional and procedural vulnerabilities and requests specific revisions to protect lawful intra-family transfers.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
A U.S. Air Force veteran supports the proposed action to clarify straw purchase definitions. The commenter argues that clear distinctions are needed to protect individuals making lawful gifts or shared purchases from being wrongly prosecuted for illegal procurement schemes.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 23, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
An individual commenter supports the proposed rule, arguing that criminalizing lawful gift purchases between family members is a regulatory overreach. They emphasize that a gift purchase should not be classified as a straw purchase when neither party is a prohibited person.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026William PattersonSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 21, 2026Joe RodriguezSupportIndividual
An individual gun owner supports the proposed rule to clarify that lawful gift purchases between family members do not constitute straw purchases. They argue that the current ambiguity puts innocent owners at risk of prosecution and urge the ATF to finalize the rule.
Read comment →
