Agency Information Collection Activities; Extension, Without Change, of a Currently Approved Collection: E-Verify+
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Agency Information Collection Activities; Extension, Without Change, of a Currently Approved Collection: E-Verify+
- Posted
- May 18, 2026
- Comment period
- May 18, 2026 – Jul 18, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09845
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 8, 2026MM1 Comment Submitted by AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual expresses opposition to the E-Verify+ system, arguing that it is confusing, lacks sufficient instructions for users, and can lead to unfair employment consequences for workers. The commenter highlights personal and anecdotal difficulties in navigating the system and suggests that the current implementation makes it harder for people to find work.
Read comment → - Jul 8, 2026Comment Submitted by AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual expresses opposition to the E-Verify+ system, arguing that it is confusing, lacks sufficient instructions for users, and can lead to unfair employment consequences for workers. The commenter highlights personal and anecdotal difficulties in navigating the system and suggests that the current implementation makes it harder for people to find work.
Read comment → - Jul 8, 2026Comment Submitted by AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual expresses opposition to the E-Verify+ system, arguing that it is confusing, lacks sufficient instructions for users, and can lead to unfair employment consequences for workers. The commenter highlights personal and anecdotal difficulties in navigating the system and suggests that the current implementation makes it harder for people to find work.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment Submitted by Makita ThatcherSupportIndividual
Makita Thatcher supports the E-Verify+ information collection but argues that it must include robust safeguards to protect workers' rights. The commenter requests specific requirements for meaningful notice, clear correction procedures before employment consequences occur, record preservation, privacy limits, and consideration of the burden placed on workers.
Read comment →
