Agency Information Collection Activities; Extension, Without Change, of a Currently Approved Collection: E-Verify+
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Agency Information Collection Activities; Extension, Without Change, of a Currently Approved Collection: E-Verify+
- Posted
- May 18, 2026
- Comment period
- May 18, 2026 – Jul 18, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09845
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 17, 2026Comment Submitted by 2 ACS INDEPENDENT SGP RETIRE 22USC212B HOSTEL CADDYS/IMPOSTER CHIA 1ST GEN LEE PENG 2 EXTINCT 4 SOCIAL VISIT H1B1OtherIndividual📎 Attachment
The comment consists of unrelated legal excerpts, personal information, and a search result for an inmate, with no discernible position on the proposed action.
Read comment → - Jul 17, 2026Comment Submitted by MANHIEM AUTO DEALER SUPPLY AND KELLEY IU BLUE BOOK OF DOD KEVIN M KELLEY OF KELLEY.IU.EDUOtherIndividual📎 Attachment
The commenter, identifying as Jeremy Mianxin Lim, submitted a highly disorganized and incoherent message containing various legal citations, personal declarations, and technical bulletins. The text does not express a clear position on the proposed E-Verify+ information collection extension.
Read comment → - Jul 17, 2026Comment Submitted by ACCURACY INTL M107OpposeBusiness
Giovanni Villella, a Director of SHOPSTOCK LTD, opposes the action, claiming it caused significant loss of clients for his business.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026Comment Submitted by WhoPoo AppOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 8, 2026MM1 Comment Submitted by AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual expresses opposition to the E-Verify+ system, arguing that it is confusing, lacks sufficient instructions for users, and can lead to unfair employment consequences for workers. The commenter highlights personal and anecdotal difficulties in navigating the system and suggests that the current implementation makes it harder for people to find work.
Read comment → - Jul 8, 2026Comment Submitted by AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual expresses opposition to the E-Verify+ system, arguing that it is confusing, lacks sufficient instructions for users, and can lead to unfair employment consequences for workers. The commenter highlights personal and anecdotal difficulties in navigating the system and suggests that the current implementation makes it harder for people to find work.
Read comment → - Jul 8, 2026Comment Submitted by AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual expresses opposition to the E-Verify+ system, arguing that it is confusing, lacks sufficient instructions for users, and can lead to unfair employment consequences for workers. The commenter highlights personal and anecdotal difficulties in navigating the system and suggests that the current implementation makes it harder for people to find work.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment Submitted by Makita ThatcherSupportIndividual
Makita Thatcher supports the E-Verify+ information collection but argues that it must include robust safeguards to protect workers' rights. The commenter requests specific requirements for meaningful notice, clear correction procedures before employment consequences occur, record preservation, privacy limits, and consideration of the burden placed on workers.
Read comment →