Anchorages; Port of New York

Steven Kalil of Dry Dock & Repair Co., Inc. opposes the proposed rulemaking, arguing that it creates navigation hazards, threatens the environment, and negatively impacts the economy and supply chains. The commenter specifically highlights risks to commercial operators due to undefined anchorage grounds and the potential disruption of the Hudson River Green Highway.

An Operations Manager for a tug and barge company opposes the proposed rule, arguing that removing or restricting designated anchorage areas reduces operational flexibility and safety for commercial mariners. The commenter emphasizes the importance of towing for regional cargo and requests that the Coast Guard consider the impact on the Maritime Transportation System.

Trevcon Construction Company, a marine contractor, supports the Coast Guard's goal of improving navigational safety but requests a specific exemption for authorized marine construction activities. They argue that the current broad language could unintentionally prohibit necessary temporary anchoring for infrastructure projects.

Robert N. Goldman, COO of NYS Marine Highway Transportation LLC, opposes the proposed rulemaking because it limits available anchorage areas without providing sufficient alternatives. He argues that these restrictions could compromise navigation safety, impact the regional economy, and reduce the Hudson River's effectiveness as a transportation corridor.

Gilbert Thomas, a retired Navy merchant mariner, opposes the proposed rulemaking because he believes it creates navigation hazards and risks the marine environment. He argues that the lack of defined anchorage grounds and the installation of high-voltage cables will endanger commercial operators and negatively impact the economy and supply chains.

Terry DeMeo, representing the Towboat & Harbor Carriers Association of the Ports of NY/NJ, opposes the proposed rule restricting vessel anchoring to locations established before January 1, 2021. The commenter argues that the restriction will reduce operational flexibility, create supply chain bottlenecks for essential commodities, and potentially increase navigational risks for vessels in the Hudson River.

The commenter opposes the proposed rulemaking, arguing that it fails to protect the marine environment while creating significant risks for navigation safety, national security, and the economy. They specifically express concern over the lack of defined anchorage grounds, the potential for increased high-voltage cable installation, and the disruption of the Hudson River Green Highway.

The commenter opposes the proposed rulemaking, arguing that it fails to protect the marine environment while creating risks for commercial navigation, national security, and the economy. They specifically express concern over the lack of defined anchorage grounds, the expansion of high-voltage cables, and the potential closure of the Hudson River Green Highway.

Alex Perlman opposes the proposed rulemaking regarding anchorages in the Port of New York, arguing that it creates navigation hazards and risks to the marine environment. The commenter claims the rules will negatively impact commercial operations, restrict vessel anchoring, and force cargo onto interstate highways.

A merchant mariner who works with tug and barge units opposes the proposed rulemaking, arguing that it creates navigation hazards and risks the marine environment. The commenter contends that the rule lacks defined anchorage grounds and will negatively impact the economy, national security, and the Hudson River Green Highway.