Seed Proposed Rule on Example Standards
SEED-2026-0001-0001Proposed Rule
Comments
6
Last activity Jun 5, 2026
Deadline
26629 days
Closes Jul 1, 2099
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
0%
+33% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Seed Proposed Rule on Example Standards
A deterministic document for local dev and e2e tests.
- Posted
- May 1, 2026
- Comment period
- May 1, 2026 – Jul 1, 2099
- Agency
- Seed Agency (SEED)
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Analyzed 4 of 6 comments
67%· analysis in progress
Stance breakdown
0%
Net support
Support2Oppose2Not yet analyzed2
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +33% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Individual
2
Trade association
1
Union
1
Not yet analyzed
2
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted May 1, 2026Deadline Jul 1, 2099
Jun 1
Support2Oppose2Other0
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
50%
50%
0%
Trade association
100%
0%
0%
Union
0%
100%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Form letters
Campaigns
Organized form-letter drives, separated from organic one-off comments.
33%of comments arrived through a form-letter campaign — 2 of 6 comments. 0 are organic, and 4 are still being processed for campaign detection.
Campaign2Organic0Not yet determined4
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jun 2, 2026United Example WorkersOpposeUnion
A union opposes the rule, arguing it weakens worker protections relative to current practice.
Read comment → - Jun 1, 2026Coalition of Example ManufacturersSupportTrade association
A manufacturers' coalition supports the rule, arguing it harmonizes conflicting state requirements and lowers compliance costs.
Read comment →