Reforms to Remove SBA's 8(a) Program's Rebuttable Presumption of Social Disadvantage for Individually Owned Firms Only; Reforms Do Not Impact Entity-Owned Firms
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Reforms to Remove SBA's 8(a) Program's Rebuttable Presumption of Social Disadvantage for Individually Owned Firms Only; Reforms Do Not Impact Entity-Owned Firms
- Posted
- Jun 11, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 11, 2026 – Jul 14, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-11765
- CFR
- 13 CFR Part 124
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Social disadvantage standard | Constitutional color blindness | Operational capacity and backlogs | Evidentiary burden for complaints | Regulatory flexibility act analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
580 Strategies LLC BusinessOppose 580 Strategies LLC, a small business and pending 8(a) applicant, opposes the Proposed Rule because it removes the person | · | · | · | ||
American Cultural Resources Association Trade associationOther The American Cultural Resources Association (ACRA), a trade association for cultural resource management firms, expresse | · | · | · | ||
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - AAJC AdvocacyOppose Asian Americans Advancing Justice – AAJC, along with seventeen other organizations, opposes the Proposed Rule because it | · | · | · | ||
Center for Individual Rights AdvocacySupport The Center for Individual Rights supports the SBA's proposal to eliminate the rebuttable presumption of social disadvant | · | · | · | ||
Citizen Potawatomi Nation GovernmentSupport The Citizen Potawatomi Nation, a Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, supports the proposed rule because it clarifies that | · | · | · | · | · |
Gov Contract Pros BusinessOppose Gov Contract Pros (GCP) opposes the proposed rule, arguing that the "New Test" for social disadvantage is poorly defined | · | · | · | ||
Government Procurement Innovators, LLC BusinessOppose Paula K. | · | · | · | ||
GRAHAMS CONSTRUCTION INC. BusinessOppose Scott Graham, an individual Native American business owner and Waccamaw Siouan Tribal Citizen, opposes the proposed rule | · | · | · | ||
Hued Customer Experience Consulting LLC dba HCX Management Solutions BusinessOppose Joy Thomas, founder of Hued Customer Experience Consulting LLC, opposes the proposed rule because it increases the evide | · | · | · | ||
Minority Business Enterprise Legal Defense and Education Fund AdvocacyOppose The Minority Business Enterprise Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. | · | · | · | ||
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. AdvocacyOppose The NAACP Legal Defense Fund, Inc. | · | · | · | · | |
Native Hawaiian Organization (NHO) AdvocacySupport Melvin Katsumi Yokoyama Jr., representing a Native Hawaiian Organization, supports the rule's protection of entity-owned | · | · | · | · | · |
Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration GovernmentSupport The Office of Advocacy, a federal government body, supports the SBA's proposed rule to remove the rebuttable presumption | · | · | · | · | |
Rapid Strategy BusinessOppose Rapid Strategy, a cybersecurity firm, opposes the proposed rule because it would likely increase administrative burdens | · | · | · | ||
Small Business Majority AdvocacyOppose Small Business Majority opposes the proposed rule to eliminate the 8(a) program's rebuttable presumption of social disad | · | · | · | · | |
Women's Construction Owners and Executives AdvocacyOppose Women Construction Owners and Executives, USA (WCOE) opposes the proposed rule because it shifts toward self-certificati | · | · |
3 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 13, 2026King AerospaceSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
King Aerospace supports the SBA's proposal to eliminate the rebuttable presumption of social disadvantage for individually owned 8(a) firms to improve transparency and address constitutional concerns. However, the company argues that the rule is insufficient on its own to increase competition, as it does not address procurement strategies that favor entity-owned 8(a) firms in specialized industries.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2026King AerospaceSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
King Aerospace supports the SBA's proposal to eliminate the rebuttable presumption of social disadvantage for individually owned 8(a) firms to improve transparency and address constitutional concerns. However, the company argues that the rule is insufficient on its own because it does not address broader procurement strategies that favor entity-owned 8(a) firms in specialized industries.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2026King AerospaceSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
King Aerospace supports the proposed rule to eliminate the rebuttable presumption of social disadvantage for individually owned 8(a) firms to improve transparency and address constitutional concerns. However, the company argues that the rule is insufficient on its own because it does not address broader procurement strategies that favor entity-owned 8(a) firms over qualified contractors in specialized industries.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2026King AerospaceSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
King Aerospace supports the SBA's proposed rule to eliminate the rebuttable presumption of social disadvantage for individually owned 8(a) firms to improve transparency and address constitutional concerns. However, the company argues that the proposal is insufficient on its own to increase competition, as it does not address procurement strategies that favor entity-owned 8(a) firms in specialized industries.
Read comment → - Jun 30, 2026Small Business MajorityOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Small Business Majority opposes the proposed rule to eliminate the 8(a) program's rebuttable presumption of social disadvantage, arguing it will prevent thousands of small business owners from accessing federal contracting opportunities. The organization contends that the program provides essential training and mentorship for historically overlooked businesses and that removing these protections will further decrease the share of contracts awarded to small and disadvantaged businesses.
Read comment → - Jun 25, 2026NuspiraOpposeIndividual
A Black entrepreneur and small business owner opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it dismantles a vital tool for addressing systemic exclusion of minority-owned businesses. The commenter contends that the 8(a) program is a necessary correction for historical inequities and suggests that the administration should instead focus on broader procurement systems that lack any set-asides.
Read comment → - Jul 2, 2026Kat SterlingOpposeIndividual📎 Attachment
The commenter, a Black business owner with MBE and ByBlack certifications, opposes the proposed rule because they believe it dismantles a critical tool for addressing systemic exclusion of minority business owners. They argue that the 8(a) program is a necessary correction for historical discrimination and call for the administration to address broader systemic inequities instead of targeting this specific program.
Read comment → - Jun 20, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOtherIndividual
The commenter is a small business owner who highlights the importance of the SBA 8(a) program in helping small businesses build past performance and transition to prime contracting roles. They advocate for preserving pathways that support the growth and development of emerging small businesses rather than taking a specific position on the proposed reforms to the rebuttable presumption of social disadvantage.
Read comment → - Jun 11, 2026John BSupportIndividualRead comment →
