Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA)
Trade associationSupport
Coating assessment technical requirements
Pipeline Safety: Eliminating Burdensome and Duplicative Deadlines for Gas Pipeline Coating Damage Assessments and Remedial Actions
PHMSA-2025-0114-0001NPRM
Comments
6
Last activity Sep 2, 2025
Deadline
31 days
Closes Sep 4, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
+17%
+17% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Pipeline Safety: Eliminating Burdensome and Duplicative Deadlines for Gas Pipeline Coating Damage Assessments and Remedial Actions
- Posted
- Jul 1, 2025
- Comment period
- Jul 1, 2025 – Sep 4, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2025-12118
- CFR
- 49 CFR Part 192
- Topics
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
+17%
Net support
Support3Oppose2Other1
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +17% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Advocacy
2
Trade association
2
Other
2
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted Jul 1, 2025Deadline Sep 4, 2026
Jun 30Jul 14Aug 18Sep 1
Support3Oppose2Other1
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Advocacy
50%
50%
0%
Trade association
100%
0%
0%
Other
0%
50%
50%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Coating assessment technical requirements | Coating integrity survey deadlines |
|---|---|---|
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA) Trade associationSupport The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA) supports the proposal to replace vague "promptly" deadlines wi | · | |
Pipeline Safety Trust AdvocacyOppose The Pipeline Safety Trust, a non-profit watchdog organization, opposes the proposed rulemaking because it delays the ide | · |
Pipeline Safety Trust
AdvocacyOppose
Coating integrity survey deadlines
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Sep 2, 2025Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA)SupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA) supports the proposal to replace vague "promptly" deadlines with concrete timelines linked to in-service dates. However, they argue that the proposed technical requirements and prescriptive voltage criteria are flawed and request modifications to allow for site-specific, technically justified assessment methods.
Read comment → - Aug 20, 2025Anonymous AnonymousOpposeOther
The commenter opposes the proposed changes to Parts 192.319 and 192.461, arguing that the revisions would increase costs for operators by creating logistical hurdles and removing specific timeframes for permit applications. They contend that the proposed changes create safety loopholes regarding the remediation of damaged pipeline coatings.
Read comment →