The Pew Charitable Trusts and The Ocean Foundation
AdvocacySupport
Management procedures
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species: North Atlantic Swordfish, South Atlantic Swordfish, North Atlantic Albacore, and Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Quotas
NOAA-NMFS-2025-0053-0001Proposed Rule
Comments
4
Awaiting comments
Deadline
--
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
+50%
+50% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Atlantic Highly Migratory Species: North Atlantic Swordfish, South Atlantic Swordfish, North Atlantic Albacore, and Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Quotas
- Posted
- May 7, 2026
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
+50%
Net support
Support3Oppose1
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +50% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Individual
1
Advocacy
3
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted May 7, 2026
Jun 1Jun 8
Support3Oppose1Other0
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Advocacy
100%
0%
0%
Individual
0%
100%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Management procedures |
|---|---|
The Pew Charitable Trusts and The Ocean Foundation AdvocacySupport The Pew Charitable Trusts and The Ocean Foundation support the proposed rule to implement increased U.S. |
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jun 8, 2026Earthjustice, Wild Oceans, and The Safina CenterSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Earthjustice and the Safina Center support the proposed rule because it aligns with the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Act by requiring that both recreational and commercial fishing mortality be counted toward the bluefin tuna quota. They argue that a previous U.S. delegation letter misinterpreted international recommendations and that failing to account for recreational catch would violate federal law and risk overfishing.
Read comment → - Jun 8, 2026Earthjustice and Wild OceansSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Earthjustice and the Safina Center support the proposed rule because it aligns with the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Act by requiring that both recreational and commercial fishing mortality be counted toward the bluefin tuna quota. They argue that a previous U.S. delegation letter misinterpreted ICCAT recommendations and that failing to count recreational catch would violate federal law and risk overfishing.
Read comment →