Guidance to Apply Interim Safe Harbors for Purposes of Determining a Taxpayer’s Material Assistance from a Prohibited Foreign Entity; Other Prohibited Foreign Entity Guidance (Notice 2026-15)
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Guidance to Apply Interim Safe Harbors for Purposes of Determining a Taxpayer’s Material Assistance from a Prohibited Foreign Entity; Other Prohibited Foreign Entity Guidance (Notice 2026-15)
- Posted
- Feb 12, 2026
- Comment period
- Feb 12, 2026 – Mar 31, 2026
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Nuclear supply chain compliance |
|---|---|
Good Energy Collective AdvocacySupport Good Energy Collective, a nuclear policy and research organization, submitted an analysis highlighting the significant c |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 7, 2026Lawyers for Good GovernmentSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Lawyers for Good Government (L4GG), a nonprofit organization, submitted comments regarding the proposed regulations for prohibited foreign entity (PFE) restrictions. They advocate for specific clarifications and safe harbors to ensure that "Elective Pay" entities (such as state and local governments and nonprofits) can navigate the new compliance requirements without undue burden or retroactive application.
Read comment → - Jun 12, 2026American Public Power AssociationSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The American Public Power Association (APPA) is urging the Treasury and IRS to provide specific guidance on the new foreign-entity-of-concerns rules to ensure energy projects and nuclear tax credits are not unnecessarily blocked. They advocate for treating publicly offered debt as not issued to specified foreign entities and for applying the debt test prospectively to debt issued during the taxable year.
Read comment → - Jun 2, 2026Jenna ZebrowskiSupportIndividual
The commenter, writing as an individual, supports the proposed regulations but urges the IRS and Treasury to ensure they do not create administrative barriers for "Elective Pay" entities, such as local governments and non-profits. They advocate for narrow definitions of "effective control," reliance on original debt issuance rather than secondary markets, and the creation of clear safe harbor tables and a compliance clearinghouse for manufacturers.
Read comment →
