FR-6616-N-01 Request for Information Regarding Products and Categories of Products Used in Housing Programs Pursuant to the Build America, Buy America Act
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- FR-6616-N-01 Request for Information Regarding Products and Categories of Products Used in Housing Programs Pursuant to the Build America, Buy America Act
- Posted
- Jun 18, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 18, 2026 – Jul 21, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-12240
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Baba compliance requirements | Supply chain and costs | Waiver process improvements | Affordable housing impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AFL-CIO UnionSupport The AFL-CIO supports the Request for Information regarding Buy America policies and urges HUD to use the data to impleme | · | · | ||
Alliance for American Manufacturing Trade associationSupport The Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM) supports HUD's Request for Information (RFI) as a necessary step toward im | · | |||
American Cement Association, National Asphalt Pavement Association, National Ready Mixed Concrete Association, and the National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association Trade associationSupport The American Cement Association and three other construction material associations are requesting that HUD recognize tha | · | · | · | |
American Chemistry Council Trade associationSupport The American Chemistry Council (ACC) Plastics Division supports HUD's effort to understand products used in housing prog | · | · | ||
Beacon Development Group BusinessOppose Beacon Development Group, an affordable housing consulting firm, argues that Build America, Buy America (BABA) complianc | · | |||
BlueLine Development, Inc. BusinessSupport BlueLine Development, Inc. | · | |||
City of Seattle GovernmentSupport The City of Seattle supports the request for information by advocating for temporary suspensions and blanket waivers for | · | · | · | |
Columbus Housing Partnership, dba Homeport BusinessSupport David Mahan of Columbus Housing Partnership (Homeport) provides feedback on the BABA requirements, noting difficulties i | · | · | ||
Community Housing of Maine (CHOM) AdvocacySupport Community Housing of Maine (CHOM), a nonprofit housing developer, supports the goals of the Build America, Buy America A | · | |||
Council of Large Public Housing Authorities (CLPHA) AdvocacyOppose The Council of Large Public Housing Authorities (CLPHA) opposes the current implementation of the Build America, Buy Ame | · | |||
Dellbrook Construction BusinessSupport Dellbrook Construction, a construction management firm, supports HUD's effort to identify product-specific non-availabil | · | |||
Denver Housing Authority GovernmentSupport The Denver Housing Authority supports the goal of using American-made products but warns that Build America, Buy America | · | |||
DEW Construction BusinessSupport DEW Construction, a builder of affordable housing units, supports the goals of the Build America, Buy America Act (BABAA | · | · | ||
Eden Housing, Inc. AdvocacySupport Eden Housing, a nonprofit affordable housing developer, provides feedback on the challenges of complying with the Build | · | |||
Fahe AdvocacyOppose Fahe, a network of nonprofit organizations in Appalachia, opposes the application of the Build America, Buy America (BAB | · | |||
Holyoke (MA) Housing Authority GovernmentSupport The Holyoke (MA) Housing Authority argues that Build America, Buy America (BABA) requirements create significant cost bu | · | |||
Housing Advisory Group Trade associationSupport The Housing Advisory Group, representing affordable housing developers, supports the RFI but argues that the Build Ameri | · | |||
Housing New Mexico | New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority GovernmentSupport Housing New Mexico, a state housing finance agency, argues that Buy America, Build America (BABA) requirements significa | · | |||
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) UnionSupport The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) supports the implementation of Buy America policies to bolste | · | |||
LeadingAge AdvocacyOppose LeadingAge, an advocacy organization representing nonprofit aging services providers, opposes the application of Build A | · | · | ||
Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD) GovernmentSupport The San Francisco Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD) supports the implementation of the Build A | · | · | ||
Mercy Housing AdvocacyOppose Mercy Housing, a nonprofit affordable housing developer, argues that the Build America, Buy America Act (BABA) creates s | · | |||
Metro West Collaborative Development AdvocacySupport Alisa Gardner-Todreas, representing the non-profit Metro West Collaborative Development, supports the goals of the Build | · | |||
Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc. BusinessSupport Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc. | · | |||
National Association of Counties (NACo) and National Association for County Community and Economic Development (NACCED) Trade associationSupport The National Association of Counties (NACo) and its affiliate, NACCED, support the goal of strengthening domestic manufa | · | · | ||
National Community Development Association AdvocacySupport The National Community Development Association (NCDA), representing over 500 local government members, supports the RFI' | · | |||
National Council of State Housing Agencies AdvocacySupport The National Council of State Housing Agencies (NCSHA) supports the Request for Information but urges a wholesale overha | · | |||
National Housing & Rehabilitation Association Trade associationSupport The National Housing & Rehabilitation Association, representing a large coalition of affordable housing developers and o | · | |||
New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) and the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) GovernmentSupport The New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) and the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HP | · | |||
Public Housing Authorities Directors Association (PHADA) Trade associationSupport The Public Housing Authorities Directors Association (PHADA) supports the goals of the Build America, Buy America Act bu | · | · | ||
Qcells BusinessSupport Qcells, a large solar manufacturing company, supports the Build America, Buy America Act and HUD's efforts to expand dom | · | · | · | |
R.K.J. Fabrication & Construction, LLC BusinessSupport Kelly Seif, owner of R.K.J. | · | · | ||
Security Industry Association Trade associationSupport The Security Industry Association (SIA) supports the goal of maximizing U.S.-made products but argues that certain categ | · | · | ||
SEMA Coalition Trade associationSupport The SEMA Coalition, representing a group of solar manufacturers, supports HUD's implementation of Build America, Buy Ame | · | · | ||
South Carolina State Housing Finance and Development Authority GovernmentSupport The South Carolina State Housing Finance and Development Authority supports HUD's effort to collect information on domes | · | |||
The NRP Group BusinessOppose The NRP Group, a large developer and builder of affordable housing, opposes the current implementation of Build America, | · | |||
True Ground Housing Partners AdvocacyOppose True Ground Housing Partners, a nonprofit affordable housing developer, opposes the current implementation of Build Amer | · | · | ||
Wyoming Community Development Authority GovernmentSupport Tammy Brandt of the Wyoming Community Development Authority supports HUD's effort to collect information on domestic pro | · | · |
2 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 20, 2026PII Comment Submitted by Enterprise Community PartnersOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Enterprise Community Partners, a national nonprofit housing developer, opposes the current application of the Build America, Buy America Act (BABA) to affordable housing programs. They argue that BABA requirements cause significant cost increases, project delays, and administrative burdens, and they recommend exempting housing from BABA or, alternatively, implementing a streamlined waiver process and a public database of compliant materials.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026PII Comment Submitted by Alliance for American ManufacturingSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM) supports HUD's Request for Information (RFI) as a necessary step toward improving the implementation of the Build America, Buy America Act (BABA). They argue that HUD should use the RFI to strengthen the law rather than weaken it, advocating for transparent, targeted, and time-limited waivers for specific manufactured products while ensuring that readily available materials like iron, steel, and lumber remain subject to domestic content requirements.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026PII Comment Submitted by National Community Development AssociationSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The National Community Development Association (NCDA), representing over 500 local government members, supports the RFI's goal of gathering information on domestic product availability but argues that current BABA requirements create significant administrative and cost burdens. They urge HUD to issue broad product waivers, implement a temporary stay on BABA requirements during the RFI review, and ultimately exempt affordable housing programs from these requirements.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026PII Comment Submitted by National Association for County Community and Economic Development and National Association of CountiesSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The National Association of Counties (NACo) and its affiliate, NACCED, support the goal of strengthening domestic manufacturing but argue that current Build America, Buy America (BABA) requirements create significant costs and delays for affordable housing projects. They recommend a categorical exemption or permanent public interest waiver for affordable housing, streamlined waiver processes, and regional considerations for product availability.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026PII Comment Submitted by Security Industry AssociationSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The Security Industry Association (SIA) supports the goal of maximizing U.S.-made products but argues that certain categories—specifically door hardware, fire alarm systems, and security cameras—lack BABA-compliant options due to global electronics supply chain constraints. They urge HUD to issue a short-term, multi-year general applicability waiver for these products to avoid project delays and increased costs.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026PII Comment Submitted by LeadingAgeOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
LeadingAge, an advocacy organization representing nonprofit aging services providers, opposes the application of Build America, Buy America (BABA) requirements to affordable housing programs. They argue that these requirements create infeasible costs and supply chain disruptions that stall housing development and request an exemption or a reformed waiver process.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026PII Comment Submitted by DuPont Performance Building SolutionsSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
DuPont Performance Building Solutions supports the objectives of the Build America, Buy America Act (BABA) but urges HUD to provide clear, practical guidance that avoids administrative burdens. They emphasize that HUD should prioritize domestic finished product manufacturing while ensuring access to high-performance, energy-efficient materials to support long-term housing affordability and durability.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026Comment Submitted by San Francisco Mayor's Office of Housing and Community DevelopmentSupportGovernment📎 Attachment
The San Francisco Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD) supports the implementation of the Build America, Buy America Act but urges HUD to streamline the waiver process. They request specific deadlines for approvals, the publication of a compliant supplier catalog, and the establishment of categorical waivers for affordable housing projects to reduce costs and delays.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026Comment Submitted by Woda Cooper Companies, Inc.OpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
Woda Cooper Companies, Inc., an affordable housing developer and construction company, opposes the current implementation of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act. They argue that BABA requirements create significant administrative burdens, increase costs due to reduced competition, and create supply chain difficulties for specific construction materials.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026Comment Submitted by International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation WorkersSupportUnion📎 Attachment
The International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers (SMART) supports HUD's implementation of the Build America, Buy America Act (BABA) for HVAC systems. They argue that strong domestic content requirements create market certainty, support high-quality American manufacturing jobs, and encourage investment in domestic production and registered apprenticeship programs.
Read comment →
