Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 16, 2026Heaviside AI LLCSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Steve McKim, Founder & CEO of Heaviside AI, LLC, a small business, supports the proposed GSAR clause regarding data safeguarding in LLMs. He argues that the core architectural requirements are commercially feasible and suggests strengthening the language to prefer machine-verifiable evidence of deletion and implementation over mere written attestations.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2026Ghost Mesh Inc.SupportBusiness
Ghost Mesh Inc. supports the proposed clause but argues that it lacks a verification mechanism for contractor attestation. They recommend requiring tamper-evident, independently verifiable records and "keep-local" inference to ensure compliance with data safeguarding and model integrity requirements.
Read comment → - Jun 24, 2026Language Research InstituteSupportAcademic📎 Attachment
The Language Research Institute (LRI), a research institution, strongly supports the proposed GSAR clause 552.239-7001 but argues that it relies too heavily on contractor self-attestation rather than architectural enforcement. They propose specific technical amendments to include multi-agent pipelines in the scope, establish structural behavioral baselines, and adopt a tiered oversight framework that prioritizes autonomous substrate-level governance for routine operations.
Read comment →
