Administrative Site Leases
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Administrative Site Leases
- Posted
- May 6, 2026
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 5, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-08937SupportGovernment
The Yampa Valley Housing Authority, a public housing authority, supports the proposed USDA rule change exempting administrative site leases from Special Use Permits. They argue that the current lease templates are incompatible with modern real estate financing, and this rule change would facilitate the development of affordable housing for Forest Service employees and the local community.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-08937OpposeIndividual
The commenter, a local resident and volunteer, opposes the proposed rule to reclassify Administrative Site Leases as it could lead to the privatization of public land and the loss of federal oversight. They argue that moving these leases out of the "special use" framework threatens historic resources and strips the Forest Service of its ability to protect public assets from private commercial interests.
Read comment →