Certification of Signal Employees
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Certification of Signal Employees
- Posted
- May 15, 2026
- Comment period
- May 15, 2026 – Jul 15, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09792
- CFR
- 49 CFR Part 246
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 1, 2026Brotherhood of Railroad SignalmenOtherUnion📎 Attachment
The Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen is requesting a 60-day extension of the public comment period for the proposed rescission of the Signal Employee Certification rule. They argue that the proposal has significant safety and workforce implications that require more time for stakeholders to provide technical and operational feedback.
Read comment → - Jun 25, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the proposed certification of signal employees, arguing that it provides a necessary federal oversight tool to ensure only qualified personnel work on safety-critical systems. They express concern that "fringe employees" with poor performance records could otherwise perform dangerous tasks on both large and small railroads.
Read comment →
