Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Registration of Money Services Businesses Regulation and FinCEN Form 107
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Registration of Money Services Businesses Regulation and FinCEN Form 107
As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, FinCEN invites comments on a renewal, without change, to information collection requirements contained in Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) regulations and FinCEN Form 107 - Registration of Money Services Business (RMSB). Under the regulations, money services businesses (MSBs) must register with FinCEN using FinCEN Form 107, renew their registration every two years, and maintain a list of their MSB agents, if applicable. This request for comments is made pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
- Posted
- Apr 30, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 30, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08363
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 8, 2026Beau FastOpposeIndividual
A title and settlement industry professional opposes the rule, stating that it creates unnecessary delays, costs, and privacy concerns for buyers and sellers. The commenter argues that the rule is overreaching in scope, particularly regarding low-dollar transactions and transfers that show no signs of unusual activity.
Read comment → - Jun 2, 2026Latisha BenfordOtherIndividual
An individual is expressing personal grievances regarding a financial dispute with Robinhood LLC and various banks. The commenter is seeking help to recover lost funds and does not address the specific information collection requirements of FinCEN Form 107.
Read comment → - May 9, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter is requesting an exemption from providing Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) to FinCEN, citing concerns over security, confidentiality, and military readiness. They argue that the reporting requirements should be waived or modified based on personal safety and national security considerations.
Read comment → - Apr 30, 2026Jeremy BerryOtherIndividual📎 Attachment
The commenter expresses a desire to vote for and receive stimulus checks, but the comment is largely incoherent and does not address the specific regulatory action regarding FinCEN Form 107. The submission appears to be off-topic and does not provide a clear position on the registration of Money Services Businesses.
Read comment → - Apr 30, 2026Dana ScioliSupportIndividual
Dana Scioli, an individual, expresses support for the registration form provided that the frequency of reporting is reduced to once a year and that the process includes mailed notices and prepaid envelopes. The commenter suggests that the government could also rely on volunteer reports to reduce regulatory burdens.
Read comment → - Apr 30, 2026Jacqueline PerezOtherIndividual📎 Attachment
The commenter appears to be providing a transcript or a series of screenshots from a web browser viewing various Federal Register notices. The text contains multiple unrelated notices from different agencies (FinCEN, SEC, Department of the Army, and CFTC) and does not express a specific position on the proposed FinCEN action.
Read comment →