Food & Beverage Issue Alliance (FBIA)
Trade associationSupport
Impact on animal food
Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT); Request for Information
FDA-2026-N-2526-0001RFI
Comments
12
Last activity Jul 13, 2026
Deadline
28 days
Closes Sep 1, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
+75%
+75% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT); Request for Information
- Posted
- May 13, 2026
- Comment period
- May 13, 2026 – Sep 1, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09507
- Topics
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
+75%
Net support
Support9Other3
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +75% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Individual
3
Advocacy
3
Trade association
6
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted May 13, 2026Deadline Sep 1, 2026
May 25Jul 6Jul 13
Support9Oppose0Other3
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Trade association
67%
0%
33%
Individual
67%
0%
33%
Advocacy
100%
0%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Impact on animal food |
|---|---|
Food & Beverage Issue Alliance (FBIA) Trade associationSupport The Food & Beverage Issue Alliance (FBIA), a coalition of 48 food and beverage trade associations, argues that the FDA s |
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jul 13, 2026Comment from Undersigned members of the Food & Beverage Issue AllianceSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The Food & Beverage Issue Alliance (FBIA), a coalition of 48 food and beverage trade associations, argues that the FDA should not revoke its authorizations for the use of BHT in foods. They contend that scientific evidence, including assessments by EFSA and JECFA, supports BHT's safety as an antioxidant and urge the agency to use a risk-based approach that considers modern scientific principles.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2026Comment from National Pork Producers CouncilSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) supports the continued authorization of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) as a safe and technologically necessary antioxidant in the food supply. They argue that BHT is essential for maintaining product quality, reducing food waste, and supporting international trade, particularly within the pork industry.
Read comment → - Jul 10, 2026Comment from American Feed Industry AssociationSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The American Feed Industry Association (AFIA) supports the continued approval of BHT, highlighting its essential role as an antioxidant in animal feed and its superiority over current alternatives. They urge the FDA to include an assessment of BHT's role in the animal food industry to avoid unintended supply disruptions and economic challenges.
Read comment →