Considerations for the Use of Artificial Intelligence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Drug and Biological Products Guidance for Industry and Other Interested Parties; Draft Guidance
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Considerations for the Use of Artificial Intelligence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Drug and Biological Products Guidance for Industry and Other Interested Parties; Draft Guidance
- Posted
- Jan 7, 2025
- Comment period
- Jan 7, 2025 – Apr 8, 2025
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Ai and ml validation guidelines | Bias and fairness | Model life cycle maintenance | Combination products | Definition of ai |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CognifAI Solutions Pvt Ltd. BusinessSupport CognifAI Solutions Pvt Ltd. | · | · |
11 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- May 5, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportBusiness
A pharmaceutical or biotechnology sponsor (implied by the use of "sponsors" and "industry" context) supports the draft guidance for using AI in regulatory decision-making. They suggest that the FDA provide further clarification on how to document human accountability and adequacy determinations when AI models are integrated as automated, embedded components of regulatory workflows.
Read comment → - Apr 7, 2025Comment from George EvgrafovSupportIndividual
The commenter suggests that the FDA clarify that human-in-the-loop oversight does not exempt AI components from rigorous validation requirements. They argue that models must be validated for accuracy, reliability, and traceability to ensure risks are not underestimated in regulatory decision-making.
Read comment →
