Bulk Drug Substances That Can Be Used To Compound Drug Products in Accordance With Section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; Establishment of a Public Docket
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Bulk Drug Substances That Can Be Used To Compound Drug Products in Accordance With Section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; Establishment of a Public Docket
- Posted
- Oct 27, 2015
- Comment period
- Oct 27, 2015 – Feb 22, 2050
- FR Doc
- 2015-27271
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Bulk compounding substances | Individualized patient care | Compounded medication benefits | Patient access to compounded medications | Patient choice and access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
state-licensed 503A compounding pharmacy BusinessSupport A state-licensed 503A compounding pharmacy is submitting a nomination for the bulk drug substance TB-500. | · | · | · |
5 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jan 27, 2024Denise JarrattSupportIndividual
An individual is requesting the removal of the ban on BPC 157 Beta 4 from the list of bulk drug substances allowed for compounding. They argue that the substance significantly improved their quality of life and mobility by treating chronic knee pain that other treatments failed to resolve.
Read comment → - Dec 17, 2023Mary Al-AkhdarOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Nov 13, 2023Isaac HosierSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Nov 8, 2023REMA KHAMOSupportIndividual
The commenter expresses deep distrust in the FDA's regulatory decisions and criticizes the agency's handling of COVID-19 vaccines and medications. They argue that the FDA should leave peptides alone and instead focus on fixing other approved medications they believe are harmful.
Read comment → - Nov 7, 2023Anonymous AnonymousOtherIndividualRead comment →
- Nov 1, 2023Carolyn GoreOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Oct 29, 2023Lynnee RogersOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Oct 27, 2023Ashley OrbersonOpposeIndividual
The commenter, identifying as someone in the industry who uses and prescribes peptides, opposes the proposed action to restrict these substances. They argue that peptides provide life-changing health benefits and symptom relief, and they urge the agency to conduct more research before implementing the ban.
Read comment → - Oct 25, 2023Darryl CampOpposeIndividual
Dr. Darryl Camp, a physician, opposes the FDA's decision to reclassify many peptides as Schedule II substances. He argues that the move lacks evidence of harm and will instead drive patients toward unregulated black markets where they face greater risks.
Read comment → - Oct 23, 2023Haley SmalleyOpposeIndividual
Haley Smalley, an employee at a doctor's office, opposes the proposal to ban certain peptides. She argues that these peptides have been effective and safe in her clinical experience, providing significant health benefits to patients.
Read comment →
