Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997: Modifications to the List of Recognized Standards, Recognition List Number: 060
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997: Modifications to the List of Recognized Standards, Recognition List Number: 060
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted electronically, including attachments, to https:// www.regulations.gov will be posted to the docket unchanged.
- Posted
- Aug 7, 2023
- Comment period
- Aug 7, 2023 – ?
- FR Doc
- 2023-16770
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Issues are identified as comment analysis progresses — nothing tagged on this document yet.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 27, 2026Comment from AnonymousOtherIndividualRead comment →
- May 13, 2026Comment from Sherie SzubskiOpposeIndividual
An individual is opposing the continued recognition of glyphosate standards, arguing that the chemical is a "poison" that contributes to health issues like MCAS and other food-related problems. The commenter urges the agency to remove these standards to protect the American population from harmful farming practices.
Read comment → - May 13, 2026Comment from Sherie SzubskiSupportIndividual📎 Attachment
Sherie Szubski, an individual living with multiple chronic conditions including MCAS and CVID, supports the modernization of standards to improve prescription navigation and care. She provides a detailed clinical summary of her conditions and treatment needs to advocate for better medical recognition and insurance coverage for complex cases.
Read comment →