Enhancing Know-Your-Upstream-Provider Requirements and Strengthening STIR/SHAKEN (Call Authentication Trust Anchor; Advanced Methods to Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls)
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Enhancing Know-Your-Upstream-Provider Requirements and Strengthening STIR/SHAKEN (Call Authentication Trust Anchor; Advanced Methods to Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls)
- Posted
- Jul 9, 2026
- Comment period
- Jul 9, 2026 – Sep 9, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-13874
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Issues are identified as comment analysis progresses — nothing tagged on this document yet.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- May 22, 2017Consumer Advisory CommitteeAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jun 2, 2017Anne PappalardoSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 2, 2017Ingrid Willenz-IsaacsOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 2, 2017Joana GomesOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 2, 2017Jondi WhitisSupportIndividual
The commenter expresses strong disapproval of corporate monopolies and calls for the FCC to better protect the public from privacy invasions. They support the action of "sending the telemarketers packing" and advocate for stricter legal penalties and license revocations for those who violate privacy.
Read comment → - Jun 2, 2017Robert E. CoxSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 2, 2017Steve ReidOtherIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 2, 2017Lucille BryantSupportIndividual
An individual expresses extreme frustration with receiving frequent telemarketing calls while dealing with a long-term illness. They urge the agency to block these types of calls and support the proposed measures to eliminate unlawful robocalls.
Read comment → - Jun 2, 2017William LaskeyOpposeIndividual
An individual is opposing the proposed action because they are concerned that the new requirements will lead to more robocalls leaving voicemails, which they find more disruptive than receiving the calls directly.
Read comment → - Jun 2, 2017larry r. walkerOtherIndividualRead comment →
