Prohibiting Importation and Marketing of Previously Authorized Covered Communications Equipment Added to the Covered List in 2024 or Earlier

Doug Augerson, owner of AceTec Security Systems, opposes the ban on Hikvision equipment. He argues that the ban would force customers to replace existing, functional systems at unreasonable costs and notes that the equipment has performed reliably for years.

Lou Garcia, President of On-Site Technology Incorporated, opposes the proposed prohibition on Hikvision equipment due to the significant financial losses, supply chain disruptions, and aftermarket support issues it would cause for their business and clients. The company requests a transition period, the ability to sell existing inventory, and continued access to replacement parts and technical support.

Lonnie DeLeeuw of American Marketing & Cable Services Inc. requests that the Commission consider the economic and supply chain impacts of the proposed action. Specifically, the commenter asks for provisions regarding the sale of existing inventory, a transition period for businesses, and continued aftermarket support for devices already in use.

Luis, a Sales Manager at Maxtech Security Systems, opposes the proposed prohibition on the importation and marketing of certain communications equipment due to the significant impact on their business and inventory. He requests a one to two-year grace period, the ability to sell existing inventory, and continued aftermarket support for current devices.

Joe Mack, CEO of 360 Systems Security, opposes the proposed prohibition on Hikvision equipment due to the significant financial losses, supply chain disruptions, and safety risks it would pose to their business and clients. He requests a transition period, the ability to sell existing inventory, and continued access to aftermarket support.