Aggregate Analytics, Inc.
BusinessOppose
Small business participation
FAR-2026-0002-0001
Comments
117
Last activity Jul 23, 2026
Deadline
--
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-5%
-5% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
-5%
Net support
Support53Oppose59Other5
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -5% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Business
77
Government
3
Individual
13
Advocacy
4
Trade association
17
Other
3
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Jun 22Jun 29Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20
Support53Oppose59Other5
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Business
34%
65%
1%
Trade association
65%
29%
6%
Individual
46%
31%
23%
Advocacy
100%
0%
0%
Government
100%
0%
0%
Other
100%
0%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Market research requirements | Small business participation | Common public comment deadline | Legal drafting style | Extension of comment deadline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aggregate Analytics, Inc. BusinessOppose Andrea Skelly, owner of Aggregate Analytics, Inc., opposes the proposed changes because they would remove protections th | · | · | · | · | |
Alaska Native Village Corporation Association (ANVCA) Trade associationSupport The Alaska Native Village Corporation Association (ANVCA) supports the administration's goals of streamlining procuremen | · | · | · | · | |
ALLUMIN8 BusinessOppose Alyssa Huffman, owner of ALLUMIN8, opposes the proposed changes to the FAR because they would disproportionately harm sm | · | · | · | ||
American Bar Association Trade associationSupport The ABA Section of Public Contract Law supports the "Revolutionary FAR Overhaul" but suggests specific improvements to e | · | · | · | ||
American Small Business League Trade associationOppose Bruce de Torres, representing the American Small Business League, opposes the proposed rules because he believes they ma | · | · | · | · | |
Bering Straits Native Corporation BusinessSupport Bering Straits Native Corporation (BSNC) supports the improvements made to the NPRM but requests further clarifications | · | · | · | ||
Bristol Bay Native Corporation (BBNC) BusinessSupport Bristol Bay Native Corporation (BBNC), an Alaska Native Regional Corporation, supports the goal of a clearer, streamline | · | · | · | · | |
CNI Government, LLC BusinessOppose CNI Government, LLC (a subsidiary of Chickasaw Nation Industries, Inc.) opposes several proposed changes to the FAR, spe | · | · | · | · | |
Council of Defense and Space Industry Associations Trade associationSupport The Council of Defense and Space Industry Associations (CODSIA) is requesting a 30-day extension to the public comment p | · | · | · | · | |
Cox-Morgan & Associates BusinessOppose Doneth Morgan, owner of Cox-Morgan & Associates, LLC, opposes the deletion of FAR PART 10 - Market Research. | · | · | · | · | |
Department of the Air Force Office of Small Business Programs (SAF/SB) GovernmentSupport The Department of the Air Force Office of Small Business Programs recommends amending FAR 6.102-3 to provide contracting | · | · | · | · | · |
Endictus Corp. BusinessSupport Endictus Corp., an SBA-certified small business, supports the simplification of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) | · | · | · | ||
Gov Contract Pros LLC BusinessOppose Gov Contract Pros (GCP) opposes the "Revolutionary FAR Overhaul" (RFO), arguing that the "model deviation" process is an | · | · | · | ||
HunaTek Holding, LLC BusinessSupport HunaTek Holding, LLC, a small business and 8(a) participant, supports the proposed FAR revisions but requests further cl | · | · | · | ||
Koniag, Incorporated BusinessSupport Koniag, Incorporated, an Alaska Native Corporation, supports the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul's goals of streamlining fede | · | · | · | ||
MJ Contractors BusinessOppose Janice Ventura, owner of MJ Contractors LLC, opposes the proposed rules because she believes they would remove the tools | · | · | · | · | |
Native American Contractors Association Trade associationSupport The Native American Contractors Association (NACA) supports the proposed FAR revisions but requests specific modificatio | · | · | · | ||
Par-Con, Inc. BusinessSupport GovContractPros, LLC, represented by CEO Trevor Skelly, requests that the FAR Council extend the public comment period f | · | · | · | ||
Southeast Cherokee Construction, Inc. BusinessOppose The commenter, a Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) with nearly 40 years of experience, opposes the proposed FAR overhaul | · | · | · | · | |
The American Small Business Chamber of Commerce Trade associationSupport The American Small Business Chamber of Commerce is requesting an extension of the public comment period for the proposed | · | · | · | · | |
The LDM Group LLC BusinessOppose Lisa Morrow, CEO of The LDM Group LLC, opposes the proposed changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulation because they r | · | · | · | · | |
U.S. Women's Chamber of Commerce BusinessOppose The U.S. | · | · |
Alaska Native Village Corporation Association (ANVCA)
Trade associationSupport
Market research requirements
ALLUMIN8
BusinessOppose
Market research requirements
Small business participation
American Bar Association
Trade associationSupport
Market research requirements
Legal drafting style
American Small Business League
Trade associationOppose
Small business participation
Bering Straits Native Corporation
BusinessSupport
Market research requirements
Legal drafting style
Bristol Bay Native Corporation (BBNC)
BusinessSupport
Market research requirements
CNI Government, LLC
BusinessOppose
Market research requirements
Council of Defense and Space Industry Associations
Trade associationSupport
Common public comment deadline
Cox-Morgan & Associates
BusinessOppose
Market research requirements
Department of the Air Force Office of Small Business Programs (SAF/SB)
GovernmentSupport
Endictus Corp.
BusinessSupport
Market research requirements
Small business participation
Gov Contract Pros LLC
BusinessOppose
Common public comment deadline
Extension of comment deadline
HunaTek Holding, LLC
BusinessSupport
Market research requirements
Legal drafting style
Koniag, Incorporated
BusinessSupport
Market research requirements
Extension of comment deadline
MJ Contractors
BusinessOppose
Small business participation
Native American Contractors Association
Trade associationSupport
Market research requirements
Legal drafting style
Par-Con, Inc.
BusinessSupport
Common public comment deadline
Extension of comment deadline
Southeast Cherokee Construction, Inc.
BusinessOppose
Small business participation
The American Small Business Chamber of Commerce
Trade associationSupport
Common public comment deadline
The LDM Group LLC
BusinessOppose
Market research requirements
U.S. Women's Chamber of Commerce
BusinessOppose
Market research requirements
Small business participation
Common public comment deadline
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jul 23, 2026Koniag, IncorporatedSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Koniag, Incorporated, an Alaska Native Corporation, supports the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul's goals of streamlining federal procurement while advocating for the preservation of small business and 8(a) program authorities. They request specific revisions to clarify statutory mandates, distinguish between civilian and DoD thresholds, and call for an extended comment period to allow for cross-part analysis.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Gov Contract Pros LLCOpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
Gov Contract Pros (GCP) opposes the "Revolutionary FAR Overhaul" (RFO), arguing that the "model deviation" process is an illegitimate, non-statutory rulemaking process that violates the Administrative Procedures Act. They request that the FAR Council rescind the model deviations and the proposed rules, citing concerns over regulatory red tape, lack of public notice, and negative impacts on small businesses.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026COGRSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
COGR, representing over 230 research universities and institutes, supports the modernization of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to improve efficiency and clarity. However, they express concerns regarding the piecemeal publication of revisions and specific new requirements for teleworking and market research, requesting standard provisions and exemptions for research-specific subcontracts to minimize administrative burdens.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Par-Con, Inc.SupportBusiness📎 Attachment
GovContractPros, LLC, represented by CEO Trevor Skelly, requests that the FAR Council extend the public comment period for four proposed rules (FAR Cases 2026-001, 2026-002, 2026-005, and 2026-007) to 60 or 90 days. The organization argues that the "revolutionary" nature and complexity of the proposed changes require more time for the public, particularly small businesses, to meaningfully review and provide feedback on potential unintended consequences.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12560SupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Chugach Alaska Corporation, an Alaska Native regional corporation, supports the Proposed Rule's restoration of express references to small business programs but requests specific revisions to ensure statutory authorities and the "Rule of Two" are clearly preserved. They also call for an extension of the comment period until FAR Part 19 is published and request government-to-government consultation with Alaska Native Corporations and Indian tribes.
Read comment → - Jul 10, 2026Ryan RobertsOtherBusiness
Ryan Roberts, acting as counsel for various government contractors, requests a 60-day extension to the comment deadline for the proposed FAR revisions. He argues that the breadth and complexity of the proposed rule require more time for contractors to assess practical impacts and formulate informed questions.
Read comment →