Aerospace Industries Association
Trade associationSupport
Cui regulatory consistency
FAR-2026-0001-0001
Comments
86
Last activity Jul 23, 2026
Deadline
--
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
+58%
+58% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
+58%
Net support
Support65Oppose15Other6
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +58% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Government
2
Individual
19
Trade association
21
Advocacy
4
Academic
4
Business
27
Other
9
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Jun 22Jun 29Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20
Support65Oppose15Other6
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Business
74%
22%
4%
Trade association
90%
5%
5%
Individual
63%
21%
16%
Other
67%
33%
0%
Advocacy
100%
0%
0%
Academic
75%
0%
25%
Government
50%
50%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Terminology and definitions42
Cui regulatory consistency35
Administrative burden on small businesses15
Mandatory sf xxx flowdown13
Removal of obsolete clauses12
Extension of comment period11
Contracting officer authority8
Section 889 compliance8
Machine-readable data requirements3
Pra data collection burdens2
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Cui regulatory consistency | Extension of comment period | Mandatory sf xxx flowdown | Administrative burden on small businesses | Removal of obsolete clauses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aerospace Industries Association Trade associationSupport The Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) supports the ongoing efforts to simplify the Federal Acquisition Regulation ( | · | · | · | · | |
Alaska Native Village Corporation Association Trade associationSupport The Alaska Native Village Corporation Association (ANVCA) supports the proposed FAR overhaul, particularly the streamlin | · | · | · | ||
American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) Trade associationSupport The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) supports the administration's initiative to overhaul the Federal Ac | · | · | · | · | |
Associated General Contractors of America Trade associationSupport The Associated General Contractors of America (AGC) supports the Office of Federal Procurement Policy's efforts to strea | · | · | · | · | |
Bristol Bay Native Corporation AdvocacySupport Bristol Bay Native Corporation, an Alaska Native Regional Corporation, supports the goal of a clearer, streamlined FAR b | · | · | · | ||
Business Software Alliance Trade associationSupport The Business Software Alliance (BSA) supports the FAR Council's efforts to modernize federal acquisition regulations but | · | · | · | · | |
CNI Government, LLC BusinessOppose CNI Government, LLC, a subsidiary of Chickasaw Nation Industries, Inc., opposes the proposed FAR rewrite due to concerns | · | · | · | · | |
COGR Trade associationSupport COGR, a national authority representing over 230 research universities and institutes, supports the FAR Council's effort | · | · | · | · | |
Globe America Consulting, Inc. BusinessSupport Globe-America Consulting, Inc. | · | · | · | · | |
Gov Contract Pros LLC BusinessOppose GovContractPros, LLC, a government contracting services firm, requests that the FAR Council extend the public comment pe | · | · | · | · | |
Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) Trade associationSupport The Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) supports the FAR Council's efforts to streamline federal acquisition p | · | · | · | · | |
Nakupuna Companies BusinessSupport Nakupuna Companies, a Native Hawaiian Organization-owned firm, supports the FAR Council's efforts to modernize and strea | · | · | · | · | |
National Defense Industrial Association Trade associationSupport The National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) supports the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) overhaul, praising | · | · | · | · | |
Palantir Technologies Inc. BusinessSupport Palantir Technologies Inc. | · | · | · | · | |
Quorara BusinessSupport Quorara, a software and advisory services provider for federal contractors, supports the proposed governmentwide standar | · | · | · | · | |
Sintavia, LLC BusinessSupport Sintavia, LLC, a defense subcontractor, supports the FAR Council's effort to standardize CUI requirements but argues tha | · | · | · | · | |
The American Small Business Chamber of Commerce Trade associationSupport The American Small Business Chamber of Commerce is requesting an extension of the public comment period for four propose | · | · | · | · | |
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Trade associationSupport The U.S. | · | · | · | ||
U.S. Women's Chamber of Commerce BusinessSupport The U.S. | · | · | · | · | |
Vanta, Inc. BusinessSupport Vanta, Inc. | · | · | · | · | |
VPM Consulting BusinessSupport Kay Wilson of VPM Consulting submits a supplemental amendment proposing specific machine-readable data requirements for | · | · | · | · |
Alaska Native Village Corporation Association
Trade associationSupport
Cui regulatory consistency
Administrative burden on small businesses
American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC)
Trade associationSupport
Cui regulatory consistency
Associated General Contractors of America
Trade associationSupport
Administrative burden on small businesses
Bristol Bay Native Corporation
AdvocacySupport
Cui regulatory consistency
Extension of comment period
Business Software Alliance
Trade associationSupport
Cui regulatory consistency
CNI Government, LLC
BusinessOppose
Removal of obsolete clauses
COGR
Trade associationSupport
Extension of comment period
Globe America Consulting, Inc.
BusinessSupport
Mandatory sf xxx flowdown
Gov Contract Pros LLC
BusinessOppose
Extension of comment period
Information Technology Industry Council (ITI)
Trade associationSupport
Cui regulatory consistency
Nakupuna Companies
BusinessSupport
Cui regulatory consistency
National Defense Industrial Association
Trade associationSupport
Mandatory sf xxx flowdown
Palantir Technologies Inc.
BusinessSupport
Removal of obsolete clauses
Quorara
BusinessSupport
Cui regulatory consistency
Sintavia, LLC
BusinessSupport
Mandatory sf xxx flowdown
The American Small Business Chamber of Commerce
Trade associationSupport
Extension of comment period
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Trade associationSupport
Cui regulatory consistency
Extension of comment period
U.S. Women's Chamber of Commerce
BusinessSupport
Extension of comment period
Vanta, Inc.
BusinessSupport
Cui regulatory consistency
VPM Consulting
BusinessSupport
Cui regulatory consistency
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jul 23, 2026American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC)SupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) supports the administration's initiative to overhaul the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to streamline procurement and reduce regulatory burdens. They provide specific feedback on various FAR parts, requesting clarifications on definitions and reporting thresholds while advocating for transparency in the selection process.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Palantir Technologies Inc.SupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Palantir Technologies Inc. supports the Administration's effort to modernize federal acquisition and promote commercial-product preferences. However, they argue that the proposed rules lack sufficient enforcement mechanisms and recommend five specific reforms to ensure accountability, clarify commercial definitions, and increase transparency for IDIQ task orders.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Nakupuna CompaniesSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Nakupuna Companies, a Native Hawaiian Organization-owned firm, supports the FAR Council's efforts to modernize and streamline the Federal Acquisition Regulation. They provide specific recommendations to clarify provisions regarding regulatory sunsets, commercial product disputes, IT service requirements, and CUI reporting to ensure clarity and reduce administrative burdens for contractors.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026American Bar AssociationSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The ABA Section of Public Contract Law supports the FAR Council's proposed revisions to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, aiming to create a more agile and efficient procurement system. The Section offers specific recommendations to improve clarity, ensure regulatory certainty for contractors, and provide sufficient time for the implementation of new requirements.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026CNI Government, LLCOpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
CNI Government, LLC, a subsidiary of Chickasaw Nation Industries, Inc., opposes the proposed FAR rewrite due to concerns that it reduces clarity, increases contracting officer discretion, and creates ambiguity. They argue that removing detailed performance standards, relocating definitions to external resources, and expanding discretionary authority will lead to increased costs, higher protest risks, and inconsistent procurement practices.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12559SupportOther📎 Attachment
Teya submits comments regarding the proposed overhaul of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). They generally support the consolidation of security requirements and the streamlining of representations and certifications, but express concerns regarding the proposed four-year regulatory sunset, the definition of commercial services for construction, and the reduction of the termination settlement proposal submission period.
Read comment → - Jul 19, 2026Jeffrey DouglasSupportGovernment📎 Attachment
Jeffrey G. Douglas, a procurement analyst at DLA Energy, argues that the FAR uses the term "purchase order" inconsistently, conflating contracting actions with fiscal obligation authority. He requests that the FAR Council amend the regulations to provide clear definitions of the specific documents, legal functions, and authorities associated with "purchase orders."
Read comment → - Jul 1, 2026David KaplanSupportIndividual
The commenter recommends amending FAR 1.402-1(a) to explicitly state that only contracting officers may solicit for contracts. They argue this change would clarify roles and prevent technical points of contact from posting invalid solicitations.
Read comment →