NetJets Aviation, Inc - Exemption/Rulemaking
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- NetJets Aviation, Inc - Exemption/Rulemaking
- Posted
- Apr 7, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 7, 2026 – ?
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Crew rest area adequacy | Pilot fatigue and safety |
|---|---|---|
Air Line Pilots Association, International UnionOppose The Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), representing over 80,000 pilots, opposes NetJets Aviation's petition to extend m | ||
Netjets Association of Shared Aircraft Pilots (NJASAP) UnionOppose The NetJets Association of Shared Aircraft Pilots (NJASAP), a labor advocate representing NetJets pilots, opposes the pr |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 1, 2026Air Line Pilots Association, InternationalOpposeUnion📎 Attachment
The Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), representing over 80,000 pilots, opposes NetJets Aviation's petition to extend maximum pilot work hours. They argue that the petition fails to demonstrate an equivalent level of safety because it lacks necessary fatigue mitigations, data-driven monitoring, and validated rest facility standards.
Read comment → - May 11, 2026Netjets Association of Shared Aircraft Pilots (NJASAP)OpposeUnion📎 Attachment
The NetJets Association of Shared Aircraft Pilots (NJASAP), a labor advocate representing NetJets pilots, opposes the proposed exemption because it establishes a repeatable operational capability that exceeds current Part 135 flight and duty time limits. They argue that the proposal lacks a measurable safety framework, fails to adequately address fatigue risk during disruptions, and should be addressed through formal rulemaking rather than a limited exemption.
Read comment → - Jul 2, 2026Thomas M (Tom) TaylorSupportIndividual📎 Attachment
A current NetJets pilot with over 34 years of experience supports the proposed action but suggests specific improvements to the implementation. The commenter recommends addressing augmented crew rules, improving crew rest facilities (such as mattresses and earplugs), and better accounting for circadian rhythms and the international dateline.
Read comment → - May 4, 2026NetJets Exemption CommentSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Bombardier, the aircraft manufacturer, provides a statement in support of NetJets' request for a crew duty time and flight time exemption for the BD-700-2A12 aircraft. They argue that the aircraft was specifically designed and certified for ultra-long-range operations and includes modern fatigue-mitigation features that support such missions.
Read comment →
