Eric Friedman - Exemption/Rulemaking
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Eric Friedman - Exemption/Rulemaking
- Posted
- Nov 25, 2024
- Comment period
- Nov 25, 2024 – ?
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Insulin-treated pilot certification | Medical certification delays |
|---|
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Aug 2, 2025Sunshine FlyersSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 7, 2026Steve EdelmanSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Dr. Steven Edelman, representing the non-profit organization Taking Control of Your Diabetes (TCOYD), supports Captain Eric Friedman's petition for exemption. He argues that establishing clear, stable standards for insulin-treated pilots will increase aviation safety, improve government efficiency, and prevent pilots from being sidelined by administrative delays.
Read comment → - Jun 13, 2026Quinton WeiskittelSupportIndividual
Quinton Weiskittel, an insulin-dependent diabetic pilot, supports Eric Friedman's petition for an exemption from specific FAA medical certification regulations. He argues that the current discretionary process is inefficient and outdated, and that a formal exemption would provide regulatory certainty, improve safety by reducing administrative burdens, and reflect modern medical advancements in diabetes management.
Read comment → - Apr 22, 2026Concerned PilotSupportIndividual
The commenter argues that the FAA's medical certification process is non-transparent and unfairly bars stable individuals, such as those using insulin, from flying. They advocate for allowing these individuals to fly based on their track record of safety and demand greater public accountability from the FAA.
Read comment → - Jan 28, 2026Emily BacinskiSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jan 27, 2026Lenna CampbellSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Dec 4, 2025Austin McCannSupportIndividual
The commenter is requesting that the agency promptly process and issue the exemption requested in the petition. They argue that the petition's core requirements—including safety standards and the removal of regulatory deadlines—remain valid.
Read comment → - Nov 18, 2025Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the petition for exemption, arguing that it would provide regulatory certainty and consistency for insulin-treated applicants by formalizing existing informal policies. They highlight that the request aligns with practices in other DOT agencies and would improve aviation safety by reducing administrative burdens and discretionary variability.
Read comment → - Sep 23, 2025Timothy SchwankeSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the petition to establish clear, public standards for medical certificate renewals. They argue that current private letters and vague guidance from AAM lead to inconsistent treatment and fear of retaliation, and that formal rules would ensure transparency and fairness.
Read comment → - Sep 23, 2025Freddie MerhebSupportIndividualRead comment →
