Proposed Approval of the Detroit, Michigan 2015 8-Hour Ozone Determination of Attainment by the Attainment Date
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Proposed Approval of the Detroit, Michigan 2015 8-Hour Ozone Determination of Attainment by the Attainment Date
- Posted
- May 29, 2026
- Comment period
- May 29, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-10767
- CFR
- 40 CFR Part 52
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Attainment determination methodology |
|---|
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by Great Lakes Environmental Law Center on the Proposed Approval of the Detroit, Michigan 2015 8-Hour Ozone Determination of Attainment by the Attainment DateOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Great Lakes Environmental Law Center, Sierra Club, and Air Law for All, Ltd. are submitting comments on behalf of several organizations and residents who oppose the EPA's proposed approval of Michigan's ozone attainment. They argue that the EPA is improperly using a belated "exceptional event" demonstration to retroactively revise ozone design values and bypass the Clean Air Act's strict statutory deadlines.
Read comment → - Jun 27, 2026Comment submitted by Persistence Analytics Group LLC on the Proposed Approval of the Detroit, Michigan 2015 8-Hour Ozone Determination of Attainment by the Attainment DateSupportBusiness
Persistence Analytics Group LLC supports the EPA's use of the Clean Air Act exceptional-events framework but emphasizes the need for transparency and verifiable evidence regarding the exclusion of wildfire-influenced data. The company requests that the final action include a clear summary of the excluded data, the justification for those exclusions, and the resulting impact on air-quality signals for public health and infrastructure planning.
Read comment → - Jun 16, 2026Comment submitted by Thomas Trimble on the Proposed Approval of the Detroit, Michigan 2015 8-Hour Ozone DAADOpposeIndividual
A local resident is urging the EPA and EGLE to withdraw the proposal to determine ozone attainment in Detroit. The commenter argues that the proposal endangers public health by "cherry-picking" data and that the air quality does not meet safety standards.
Read comment →