Alliance for Automotive Innovation
Trade associationOppose
Regulatory clarity and feasibility
Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances (26-2)
EPA-HQ-OPPT-2025-2932-0001NPRM
Comments
11
Last activity Jul 17, 2026
Deadline
Closed on Jul 11, 2026
Closed Jul 11, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-36%
-36% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances (26-2)
Federal Register for Friday, April 24, 2026 (91 FR 22075) [FRL-13085-01-OCSPP]
- Posted
- Apr 24, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 24, 2026 – Jul 11, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08012
- CFR
- 40 CFR Part 721
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
-36%
Net support
Support2Oppose6Other3
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -36% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Business
4
Individual
2
Trade association
3
Advocacy
2
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted Apr 24, 2026Deadline Jul 11, 2026
May 4May 11Jul 6Jul 13
Support2Oppose6Other3
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Business
0%
75%
25%
Trade association
0%
100%
0%
Individual
100%
0%
0%
Advocacy
0%
0%
100%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Regulatory clarity and feasibility |
|---|---|
Alliance for Automotive Innovation Trade associationOppose The Alliance for Automotive Innovation opposes the proposed Significant New Use Rules (SNUR) because they argue the rule | |
Chemical Users Coalition (CUC) Trade associationOppose The Chemical Users Coalition (CUC), an association representing major companies like Boeing and IBM, opposes the propose | |
Panasonic Corporation of North America BusinessOppose Panasonic Corporation of North America opposes the proposed rule because it eliminates the article exemption at the poin | |
Ultium Cells LLC and General Motors LLC BusinessOppose Ultium Cells LLC and General Motors LLC oppose the proposed SNURs, arguing that they are based on insufficient data, cre |
Chemical Users Coalition (CUC)
Trade associationOppose
Regulatory clarity and feasibility
Panasonic Corporation of North America
BusinessOppose
Regulatory clarity and feasibility
Ultium Cells LLC and General Motors LLC
BusinessOppose
Regulatory clarity and feasibility
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.