Pesticide Product Registration: Applications for New Active Ingredients (March 2026)
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Pesticide Product Registration: Applications for New Active Ingredients (March 2026)
Federal Register for Monday, June 22, 2026 (91 FR 37111) ( FRL–13200–03– OCSPP) EPA–HQ–OPP–2026–0333; Pesticide Product Registration; Receipt of Applications for New Active Ingredients (March 2026)
- Posted
- Jun 22, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 22, 2026 – Jul 23, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-12418
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Specialty crop pest management | Sterile insect technology |
|---|---|---|
Revive & Restore AdvocacySupport Ryan Phelan of Revive & Restore, a nonprofit conservation organization, supports the registration of KNOCKOUT™ SWD. | ||
The Breakthrough Institute AdvocacySupport The Breakthrough Institute supports the registration of KNOCKOUT™ SWD, a CRISPR-based sterile insect technique for contr | ||
United States Department of Agriculture GovernmentSupport The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) supports the EPA's consideration of the Knockout SWD technology for c |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 21, 2026Comment submitted by Jason DelborneSupportAcademic
The commenter, identifying as a researcher of emerging biotechnologies, supports a rigorous and science-based EPA review of the KNOCKOUT SWD application. They advocate for the testing and monitoring of self-limiting genetic technologies that offer potential environmental benefits over traditional pesticides.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026Comment submitted by Ann ThresherSupportAcademic
Professor Ann C Thresher, an environmental ethicist and public policy researcher, supports the consideration of the Knockout SWD technology. She argues that the technology offers ethical benefits, such as reducing pesticide use and mitigating ecological harm, while urging the EPA to consult with environmental ethicists during the regulatory process.
Read comment →
