Pesticide Product Registration: Applications for New Active Ingredients (March 2026)
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Pesticide Product Registration: Applications for New Active Ingredients (March 2026)
Federal Register for Monday, June 22, 2026 (91 FR 37111) ( FRL–13200–03– OCSPP) EPA–HQ–OPP–2026–0333; Pesticide Product Registration; Receipt of Applications for New Active Ingredients (March 2026)
- Posted
- Jun 22, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 22, 2026 – Jul 23, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-12418
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Specialty crop pest management | Sterile insect technology |
|---|---|---|
Revive & Restore AdvocacySupport Ryan Phelan of Revive & Restore, a nonprofit conservation organization, supports the registration of KNOCKOUT™ SWD. | ||
The Breakthrough Institute AdvocacySupport The Breakthrough Institute supports the registration of KNOCKOUT™ SWD, a CRISPR-based sterile insect technique for contr | ||
United States Department of Agriculture GovernmentSupport The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) supports the EPA's consideration of the Knockout SWD technology for c |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 22, 2026Comment submitted by San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance (SDZWA)Analysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 22, 2026Comment submitted by Northwest Horticultural Council (NHC)Analysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 22, 2026Comment submitted by Washington Red Raspberry Commission (WRRC)Analysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 22, 2026Comment submitted by Angela MeccarielloSupportAcademic
An Assistant Professor at Imperial College London supports the EPA's rigorous evaluation of KNOCKOUT SWD, arguing that the technology offers a precise, environmentally responsible, and biologically contained alternative to conventional insecticides. The commenter highlights the technology's reliance on established Sterile Insect Technique principles and its inherent safety features like species specificity and reversibility.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Comment submitted by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)SupportGovernment📎 Attachment
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) supports the EPA's consideration of the Knockout SWD technology for controlling the invasive spotted wing drosophila. The USDA highlights that this gene-editing approach provides a cost-effective, non-irradiation sterile insect technique (SIT) that could reduce reliance on traditional insecticides.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Comment submitted by Columbia Gorge Fruit GrowersSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
Lesley Tamura, Board Chair of Columbia Gorge Fruit Growers, supports the EPA's science-based evaluation of Agragene's KNOCKOUT SWD technology. She argues that specialty crop growers need more innovative pest management tools to combat challenges like Spotted Wing Drosophila and maintain a resilient food supply.
Read comment → - Jul 21, 2026Comment submitted by Luke AlpheySupportAcademic
Professor Luke Alphey of the University of York supports the EPA's registration of the pgSIT technology. He argues that the technology is functionally similar to established sterile insect techniques, poses no credible risk to the environment, and provides a necessary tool for managing invasive pests.
Read comment → - Jul 21, 2026Comment submitted by Jason DelborneSupportAcademic
The commenter, identifying as a researcher of emerging biotechnologies, supports a rigorous and science-based EPA review of the KNOCKOUT SWD application. They advocate for the testing and monitoring of self-limiting genetic technologies that offer potential environmental benefits over traditional pesticides.
Read comment → - Jul 21, 2026Comment submitted by John MarshallSupportAcademic
John Marshall, a mathematical biologist, supports the EPA's review of precision-guided sterile insect technique (pgSIT) for spotted wing Drosophila. He argues that the technology is promising, cost-efficient, and carries reduced risks due to its self-limiting nature and reduced fitness costs compared to traditional methods.
Read comment → - Jul 21, 2026Comment submitted by Revive & RestoreSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Ryan Phelan of Revive & Restore, a nonprofit conservation organization, supports the registration of KNOCKOUT™ SWD. He argues that this precision-guided Sterile Insect Technique offers a species-specific, environmentally safe alternative to broad-spectrum insecticides and sets a vital regulatory precedent for future genetic biocontrol technologies.
Read comment →
