Pesticide Tolerance; Exemptions, Petitions, Revocations, etc.: Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities—February 2026
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Pesticide Tolerance; Exemptions, Petitions, Revocations, etc.: Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities—February 2026
Federal Register for Monday, June 15, 2026 (91 FR 35936) ( FRL–13201–02– OCSPP) EPA–HQ–OPP–2026–0332 Receipt of Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities—February 2026
- Posted
- Jun 22, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 22, 2026 – Jul 16, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-11942
- CFR
- 40 CFR Parts 174 and 180
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Issues are identified as comment analysis progresses — nothing tagged on this document yet.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 15, 2026Anonymous public commentOtherIndividual
An anonymous Florida resident expresses support for the public health goals of mosquito control but opposes the requested blanket tolerance for wide-area mosquito adulticide. The commenter requests that the EPA impose specific drift and exposure mitigation measures, such as buffer zones and restricted application timing, due to ecological risks to pollinators and aquatic life.
Read comment → - Jul 15, 2026Comment submitted by Silvio Mazzella Jr.OtherIndividual📎 Attachment
Silvio Mazzella Jr. provides a series of scientific observations and research citations regarding the potential neurotoxic, endocrine-disrupting, and ecotoxicological effects of specific pesticides like fenpropathrin, famoxadone, and cymoxanil. The commenter expresses concerns about human health impacts (particularly on children) and environmental risks without explicitly requesting a specific regulatory change to the proposed action.
Read comment → - Jul 15, 2026Anonymous public commentOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed pesticide petitions and exemptions, arguing that the EPA should strictly follow its mandate to protect the environment and public health. They express concerns about government corruption and the potential for loopholes to harm the environment.
Read comment →
