Easterseals Southern California
AdvocacySupport
Transition discovery methodology
Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request; Case Service Report (RSA-911)
ED-2026-SCC-1717-0001Notice
Comments
12
Last activity Jul 20, 2026
Deadline
Closed on Jul 21, 2026
Closed Jul 21, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
+42%
+42% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request; Case Service Report (RSA-911)
- Posted
- May 21, 2026
- Comment period
- May 21, 2026 – Jul 21, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-10134
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
+42%
Net support
Support8Oppose3Other1
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +42% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Government
5
Individual
2
Advocacy
1
Other
4
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted May 21, 2026Deadline Jul 21, 2026
May 18Jun 15Jun 29Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20
Support8Oppose3Other1
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Government
60%
40%
0%
Other
100%
0%
0%
Individual
0%
50%
50%
Advocacy
100%
0%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Transition discovery methodology |
|---|---|
Easterseals Southern California AdvocacySupport Maureen Carasiti of Easterseals Southern California supports the Rehabilitation Services Administration's efforts to str |
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jul 15, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-10134OpposeGovernment
The Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services opposes the removal of 63 data elements related to comparable benefits from the RSA 911 Case Service Report. They argue that deleting these elements prevents the reporting of essential services provided by outside agencies and creates a void in documentation and compliance regarding the utilization of comparable benefits.
Read comment → - Jul 8, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-10134SupportGovernment
The South Carolina Commission for the Blind (SCCB) supports the proposed removal of certain data elements to reduce administrative burdens on state VR agencies. They request additional guidance on complying with existing regulations without individual-level data collection and suggest further revisions to reporting requirements for purchased service providers and referral sources.
Read comment → - Jul 6, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-10134SupportGovernment
The Vermont Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (DVR) supports the proposed removal of comparable benefits reporting from the RSA-911 report, noting it will reduce workload and improve data quality. They also welcome the restoration of DE 76 for educational attainment but request further guidance on how to handle data variations and specific coding scenarios.
Read comment → - Jun 16, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-10134OpposeGovernment
Michigan Rehabilitation Services (MRS) opposes the removal of the Comparable Benefits reporting requirement, arguing that it is a vital accountability tool for ensuring regulatory compliance. They express concern that removing the requirement would reduce transparency, increase unnecessary expenditures, and weaken oversight against fraud and waste.
Read comment →