Hearings, Meetings, Proceedings, etc.: Cultural Property Advisory Committee; Proposals to Extend Bilateral Cultural Property Agreements with Albania and Nigeria; Receipt of a Request from Romania under the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Hearings, Meetings, Proceedings, etc.: Cultural Property Advisory Committee; Proposals to Extend Bilateral Cultural Property Agreements with Albania and Nigeria; Receipt of a Request from Romania under the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act
The Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy calls a meeting of the Cultural Property Advisory Committee in accordance with the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2601-2613) (“the Act”). The Committee will review a request from Romania for assistance protecting its cultural property and proposed extensions of bilateral cultural property agreements with Albania and Nigeria. In addition, the Committee will review the effectiveness of other cultural property agreements and emergency actions currently in force, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2605(g). A portion of this meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) and 19 U.S.C. 2605(h).
- Posted
- Jun 4, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 4, 2026 – Jul 6, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-11197
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Cultural heritage protection | Market legitimacy | Mou opposition |
|---|---|---|---|
Archaeological Institute of America AdvocacySupport The Archaeological Institute of America (AIA) expresses strong support for the request by the Government of Romania to e | · | · | |
Committee for Cultural Policy, Inc AdvocacyOppose The Committee for Cultural Policy, Inc. | · | · | |
International Association of Professional Numismatists Trade associationSupport The International Association of Professional Numismatists (IAPN) supports the review of the Cultural Property Agreement | · | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 5, 2026Daniel SedwickOpposeBusiness
A representative of an IAPN member firm opposes the renewal of import restrictions on Albanian coins and the consideration of new restrictions on Romanian coins. They argue that these restrictions harm the international trade of coins and the hobby of coin collecting, requesting that any restrictions clearly exempt coins from legal markets.
Read comment → - Jul 3, 2026Aaron PaulOpposeIndividual
Aaron J. Paul, a retired curator of Greek, Etruscan, and Roman art, opposes the proposed MOUs with Romania and Albania. He argues that the broad inclusion of coins in these agreements infringes on the rights of American citizens and contradicts EU trade laws.
Read comment → - Jul 2, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual coin collector opposes the proposed import restrictions and bilateral cultural property agreements with Albania, Nigeria, and Romania. The commenter argues that these actions infringe on private property rights and harm the hobby of coin collecting, requesting that any agreements clearly exempt widely circulated or legally imported coins.
Read comment → - Jul 2, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual opposes the proposed MOUs with Romania, Albania, and Nigeria, arguing that they are too broad and place an unfair burden of proof on U.S. citizens. The commenter requests a more rigorous review to ensure the agreements comply with the CPIA and do not infringe upon the rights of American citizens.
Read comment → - Jul 1, 2026Philip MatteraOpposeIndividual
Philip Mattera, a coin collector and student of ancient history, opposes the proposed MOUs with Romania, Albania, and Nigeria. He argues that the agreements are too broad, infringe on the rights of American collectors, and fail to meet the original objectives of the Cultural Property Implementation Act.
Read comment → - Jul 1, 2026Tom MannOpposeIndividual
Tom, an individual commenter, opposes the proposed MOUs with Romania, Albania, and Nigeria. He argues that the agreements are too broad, ineffective, and infringe on the rights of American citizens, while expressing concerns about the corruption of the involved governments.
Read comment → - Jun 28, 2026Comment on DOS-2026-0628-0001OpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The International Association of Professional Numismatists (IAPN) opposes the proposed extension of the Cultural Property Agreement with Albania because it includes overbroad restrictions on coins that circulated internationally. They argue that the agreement should be limited to coins exclusively found in Albania of cultural significance and should provide for the legal entry of coins with valid E.U. export documentation.
Read comment → - Jun 26, 2026John SawyerOpposeIndividual
John Sawyer, an ancient coin collector and student of history, opposes the proposed MOUs with Romania, Albania, and Nigeria. He argues that the agreements are too broad, infringe on the rights of American collectors, and fail to meet the original objectives of the Cultural Property Implementation Act.
Read comment → - Jun 25, 2026Andy PierucciOpposeIndividual
Andy Pierucci, a collector and student of history, opposes the proposed MOUs with Romania, Albania, and Nigeria because he believes they are too broad and place impossible documentation burdens on collectors of ancient coins. He argues that the agreements infringe on the rights of American citizens and may unfairly impact the cultural heritage of minority populations.
Read comment → - Jun 25, 2026peter jonesOpposeIndividual
Peter D. Jones, an ancient coin collector and student of history, opposes the proposed MOUs with Romania, Albania, and Nigeria. He argues that the agreements are too broad, infringe on the rights of American collectors, and fail to meet the original objectives of the Cultural Property Implementation Act.
Read comment →
