Colorado Mining Association
Trade associationOppose
Uranium leasing program
Zero-Based Regulating
DOE-HQ-2025-0603-0002Rule
Comments
22
Last activity Jun 29, 2026
Deadline
Closed on Jun 30, 2026
Closed Jun 30, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-73%
-73% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Zero-Based Regulating
- Posted
- May 29, 2026
- Comment period
- May 29, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-10727
- CFR
- 10 CFR Parts 300 602 605 706 708 712 719 725 727
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
-73%
Net support
Support2Oppose18Other2
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -73% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Business
4
Government
1
Individual
9
Trade association
2
Advocacy
6
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted May 29, 2026Deadline Jun 30, 2026
May 25Jun 1Jun 15Jun 22Jun 29
Support2Oppose18Other2
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
0%
78%
22%
Advocacy
0%
100%
0%
Business
50%
50%
0%
Trade association
0%
100%
0%
Government
0%
100%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Administrative procedure act violations | Uranium leasing program | Zero-based regulation | Automatic sunset provisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Colorado Mining Association Trade associationOppose The Colorado Mining Association (CMA) opposes the proposal to establish conditional sunset dates for regulations adminis | · | · | · | |
Institute for Policy Integrity at NYU School of Law AdvocacyOppose The Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law opposes the Department of Energy's Sunset Rule, | · | |||
Premier American Uranium Inc. BusinessOppose Premier American Uranium Inc. | · |
Institute for Policy Integrity at NYU School of Law
AdvocacyOppose
Administrative procedure act violations
Zero-based regulation
Automatic sunset provisions
Premier American Uranium Inc.
BusinessOppose
Administrative procedure act violations
Uranium leasing program
Zero-based regulation
2 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jun 29, 2026Colorado Mining AssociationOpposeTrade association📎 Attachment
The Colorado Mining Association (CMA) opposes the proposal to establish conditional sunset dates for regulations administering the Uranium Leading Program (ULP). They argue that sunsetting these provisions could compromise significant investments made by leaseholders and negatively impact the domestic supply of critical minerals.
Read comment → - Jun 29, 2026Western Small Miners AssociationOpposeTrade association📎 Attachment
The Western Small Miners Association, a mining trade organization, opposes the proposed rule to "sunset" the Uranium Leasing Program (ULP). They argue that the rule unfairly terminates existing leaseholder rights without compensation and fails to provide a plan for maintaining the nation's strategic uranium reserves.
Read comment → - Jun 27, 2026Premier American Uranium Inc.OpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
Premier American Uranium Inc. opposes the Direct Final Rule to sunset the Uranium Leasing Program, arguing that it extinguishes their valid lease rights without just compensation and contradicts U.S. policy to increase domestic uranium production. The company requests that the Department of Energy withdraw the rule or, at minimum, extend the comment period due to the short notice and errors in the notification.
Read comment →