Whistleblower Award Determination
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Whistleblower Award Determination
- Posted
- Jun 15, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 15, 2026 – Jul 16, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-12006
- CFR
- 17 CFR Part 165
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 15, 2026BSM Supervisão de MercadosSupportOther📎 Attachment
BSM Supervisão de Mercados, a Brazilian self-regulatory entity, submits comments supporting the CFTC's goal of improving whistleblower program efficiency and transparency. While they do not have a financial award program, they share their own reporting model and best practices to foster international dialogue on market integrity.
Read comment → - Jul 15, 2026Better MarketsSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Better Markets, Inc. supports the proposed rule to establish a 30% award presumption for meritorious whistleblowers to improve efficiency and transparency. While they support the rule, they suggest the Commission consider a higher $15 million threshold to further reduce processing times.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2026Stephen HasegawaSupportBusiness
A partner at the law firm Phillips & Cohen, LLP supports the Proposed Rule because it streamlines the award process for smaller cases and preserves resources for larger ones. However, the commenter suggests adding a provision to ensure that whistleblowers in cases exceeding the $5 million threshold do not receive smaller awards than those who fall under the new presumption.
Read comment → - Jun 19, 2026Emily StulzOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed whistleblower award program, arguing that monetary incentives may encourage fraudulent claims and the targeting of political opponents. They suggest that the government should focus on creating rules to protect whistleblowers based on moral decency rather than providing financial rewards.
Read comment →
