National Treasury Employees Union
UnionOppose
Privacy act compliance
CFPB.009-Employee Administrative Records System
CFPB-2026-0016-0001Notice
Comments
53
Awaiting comments
Deadline
Closed on Jun 23, 2026
Closed Jun 23, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-98%
-98% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- CFPB.009-Employee Administrative Records System
- Posted
- May 20, 2026
- Comment period
- May 20, 2026 – Jun 23, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-10113
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
-98%
Net support
Oppose52Other1
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -98% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Union
2
Government
3
Individual
47
Advocacy
1
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted May 20, 2026Deadline Jun 23, 2026
May 18May 25Jun 15Jun 22
Support0Oppose52Other1
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
0%
98%
2%
Government
0%
100%
0%
Union
0%
100%
0%
Advocacy
0%
100%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Privacy act compliance | Employee privacy | Employee privacy and surveillance |
|---|---|---|---|
National Treasury Employees Union UnionOppose The National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) opposes the proposed routine use because it is too vague and broad, potenti | · | · |
2 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.