Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 35 comments from the past week
35 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Aug 4, 2026LindeSupportBusiness
Linde provides input on the Request for Information regarding offshore space launch and re-entry activities. They recommend that BOEM consider the specific infrastructure, safety, and logistical requirements for handling cryogenic and non-cryogenic gases in a marine environment.
Read comment → - Aug 4, 2026ROICE Program Collaborative, University of HoustonSupportAcademic📎 Attachment
Dr. Ram Seetharam, representing the ROICE Program Collaborative at the University of Houston, supports the exploration of repurposing offshore oil and gas infrastructure for space launch and reentry. The commenter provides technical, regulatory, and commercial frameworks to assist BOEM in evaluating feasibility, identifying suitable platforms, and addressing decommissioning liabilities.
Read comment → - Aug 3, 2026South Atlantic, Mid Atlantic, and New England Fishery Management CouncilsAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 30, 2026Virginia Spaceport AuthoritySupportGovernment📎 Attachment
The Virginia Spaceport Authority (VSA) supports the development of a framework for offshore space launch and re-entry activities, advocating for a performance-based, technology-neutral regulatory approach. They emphasize the need for integrated coordination between federal and state agencies, Marine Spatial Planning, and liability protections similar to those provided for land-based operations.
Read comment → - Jul 28, 2026The Spaceport CompanySupportBusiness📎 Attachment
The Spaceport Company (TSC), a small aerospace business, supports the potential use of the Outer Continental Shelf for offshore space launch and re-entry activities. They argue that offshore infrastructure offers lower environmental impacts, enhanced national security, and new economic opportunities for coastal communities compared to existing onshore sites.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026PMSAAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 15, 2026Virginia Maritime AssociationSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The Virginia Maritime Association (VMA) supports the potential use of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) for commercial space activities, provided they do not impair maritime navigation safety. They request that BOEM treat established shipping fairways as exclusionary factors and require navigation safety assessments that account for the larger dynamic safety zones of launch and re-entry operations.
Read comment → - Aug 4, 2026jason vogelsongOtherIndividual
Captain Jason Vogelsong, a commercial fisherman, expresses concern over the economic impact of offshore space launch activities on the rock shrimp fishing industry. He argues that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) should establish a compensation mechanism for fishermen who lose catch time and incur fuel costs due to mandatory evacuations.
Read comment → - Aug 3, 2026Comment from Cape Cod CommissionAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Aug 3, 2026Andrew ThalerOpposeOther
The commenter argues that the Secretary of the Interior lacks the statutory authority under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to grant leases or rights-of-way for commercial space launch and reentry activities. They contend that the Act's authority is limited to energy-related or other authorized marine-related purposes.
Read comment →
