Defining `Willfully' for Firearms Violations

The commenter supports the ATF's proposal to define "willfully" to distinguish between intentional violations and honest mistakes by firearms dealers. They urge the agency to further strengthen the rule by requiring a finding of willfulness before initiating revocation proceedings, rejecting vicarious liability for employee errors, and accurately reflecting the high legal costs of such proceedings.

The commenter supports the ATF's proposal to define "willfully" to distinguish between intentional violations and honest mistakes by firearms dealers. They urge the agency to further strengthen the rule by requiring a finding of willfulness before initiating revocation proceedings, rejecting vicarious liability for employee errors, and accurately reflecting the high legal costs of such proceedings.

The commenter supports the ATF's proposal to define "willfully" to distinguish between intentional violations and honest mistakes by firearms dealers. They urge the agency to further strengthen the rule by requiring a finding of willfulness before initiating revocation proceedings, rejecting vicarious liability for employee errors, and accurately reflecting the high legal costs of such proceedings.

The commenter supports the ATF's proposal to define "willfully" for firearms violations, arguing that it protects law-abiding dealers from being penalized for honest mistakes. They urge the agency to further strengthen the rule by requiring a finding of willfulness before initiating revocation proceedings, rejecting vicarious liability for employee errors, and accurately reflecting the high legal costs of such proceedings.

The commenter, identifying as a law-abiding gun owner, supports the ATF's proposal to define "willfully" to distinguish between intentional violations and honest mistakes. They urge the agency to further strengthen the rule by requiring a finding of willfulness before initiating revocation proceedings, rejecting vicarious liability for employee errors, and accurately accounting for the high legal costs faced by dealers.

The commenter, identifying as a law-abiding gun owner, supports the ATF's proposal to define "willfully" for firearms violations to prevent honest mistakes from resulting in license revocations. They urge the agency to further strengthen the rule by requiring a finding of willfulness before initiating revocation proceedings, rejecting vicarious liability for employee errors, and more accurately accounting for the high legal costs faced by dealers.

James Stubinski, a firearms owner, supports the ATF's proposal to define "willfully" as requiring actual knowledge of unlawful conduct. He urges the agency to further strengthen the rule by requiring a finding of willfulness before initiating license revocations, rejecting vicarious liability for employee mistakes, and accurately reflecting the high legal costs faced by dealers.

The commenter, identifying as a law-abiding gun owner, supports the ATF's proposal to define "willfully" for firearms violations to prevent honest mistakes from resulting in license revocations. They urge the agency to further strengthen the rule by requiring a finding of willfulness before initiating revocation proceedings, rejecting vicarious liability for employee errors, and more accurately accounting for the high legal costs faced by dealers.

The commenter supports the ATF's proposal to define "willfully" to distinguish between intentional violations and honest mistakes by firearms dealers. They urge the agency to further strengthen the rule by requiring a finding of willfulness before initiating revocation proceedings, rejecting vicarious liability for employee errors, and accurately reflecting the high legal costs of such proceedings.

The commenter supports the ATF's proposal to define "willfully" for firearms violations to distinguish between intentional violations and honest mistakes. They urge the agency to further strengthen the rule by requiring a finding of willfulness before initiating revocation proceedings, rejecting vicarious liability for employee errors, and accurately accounting for the high legal costs faced by dealers.