RIN0970-AD38_ReducingBureaucracyandBurdenforFamilyAssistancePrograms
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- RIN0970-AD38_ReducingBureaucracyandBurdenforFamilyAssistancePrograms
- Posted
- May 26, 2026
- Comment period
- May 26, 2026 – Jun 26, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-10401
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Due process requirements | Regulatory housekeeping | Tribal sovereignty |
|---|---|---|---|
FGA Action AdvocacySupport FGA Action supports the proposed rule to remove obsolete, duplicative, and unnecessary regulations from the family assis | · | · | |
Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California GovernmentOther Chairman Serrell Smokey of the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California expresses concerns that the proposed rule may dimin | · | ||
Western Center on Law & Povery AdvocacyOther Western Center on Law and Poverty, a legal services support center, expresses mixed feelings regarding the proposed repe | · | · |
2 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 23, 2026Western Center on Law & PoveryOtherAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Western Center on Law and Poverty, a legal services support center, expresses mixed feelings regarding the proposed repeal of certain TANF regulations. While they generally find the repeal unobjectionable, they oppose the removal of specific requirements regarding due process for hearings, single state agency oversight, and merit system personnel standards.
Read comment → - Jun 17, 2026FGA ActionSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
FGA Action supports the proposed rule to remove obsolete, duplicative, and unnecessary regulations from the family assistance regulatory framework. They argue that streamlining the Code of Federal Regulations will reduce administrative burdens and allow program administrators to focus on current statutory requirements and service delivery.
Read comment → - Jul 8, 2026WashoeTribe CommentOtherGovernment📎 Attachment
Chairman Serrell Smokey of the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California expresses concerns that the proposed rule may diminish tribal sovereignty by applying uniform standards to tribes that differ from state and local programs. While the tribe supports reducing bureaucratic barriers, they advocate for more meaningful consultation and flexibility to address the diverse needs of tribal nations.
Read comment → - Jun 25, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-10401OtherAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles (LAFLA) provides feedback on the proposed repeal of several regulations, noting that while some may be obsolete, others provide important procedural and administrative frameworks. They specifically request clarification on which authorities will govern state plan administration, fiscal oversight, and—most importantly—hearing and administrative review procedures if the proposed repeals occur.
Read comment → - Jun 25, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-10401OpposeGovernment📎 Attachment
The Maryland Department of Human Services opposes the removal of specific regulations regarding the Family Violence Option, Work Participation Rates, and the Contingency Fund, arguing that these provisions provide essential interpretive certainty and operational clarity. They contend that removing them would create ambiguity, potentially jeopardize access to federal funding, and substitute stable regulations with less durable sub-regulatory guidance.
Read comment → - Jun 16, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
