Agency Information Collection Activities; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection: E-Verify Program
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Agency Information Collection Activities; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection: E-Verify Program
- Posted
- May 13, 2026
- Comment period
- May 13, 2026 – Jul 14, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09530
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Reverification functionality |
|---|---|
American Immigration Lawyers Association Trade associationOther The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) submitted comments regarding the proposed expansion of the E-Verify |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 9, 2026Comment Submitted by The American Immigration Lawyers AssociationOtherTrade association📎 Attachment
The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) submitted comments regarding the proposed expansion of the E-Verify program to include reverification functionality. They argue that USCIS must provide a clearer statutory basis for this expansion, a more comprehensive burden analysis under the Paperwork Reduction Act, and additional clarity on several other proposed technical and procedural changes.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment Submitted by Makita ThatcherSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the E-Verify Program information collection but argues that it must include specific safeguards to protect workers from inaccurate data matches. They advocate for clearer worker notices, stricter employer obligations, better audit logs, and improved language and digital accessibility to ensure workers can meaningfully contest errors.
Read comment →
