Pipeline Safety: Atmospheric Corrosion Reassessment for Pipeline Replacements
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Pipeline Safety: Atmospheric Corrosion Reassessment for Pipeline Replacements
- Posted
- Jul 1, 2025
- Comment period
- Jul 1, 2025 – Sep 4, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2025-12117
- CFR
- 49 CFR Part 192
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Atmospheric corrosion reassessment requirements | Comment period extension | Remediation methods for atmospheric corrosion |
|---|---|---|---|
American Gas Association Trade associationSupport The American Gas Association, American Public Gas Association, and Northeast Gas Association support the proposed rule t | · | · | |
Pipeline Safety Trust AdvocacySupport Erin Sutherland of the Pipeline Safety Trust, a nonprofit watchdog organization, is requesting a 30-day extension of the | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Sep 2, 2025American Gas AssociationSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The American Gas Association, American Public Gas Association, and Northeast Gas Association support the proposed rule to exempt service lines from the three-year atmospheric corrosion reassessment if the affected portions are remediated. They argue that full service line replacement is unnecessary, poses higher safety risks than targeted repairs, and is significantly more costly.
Read comment → - Sep 2, 2025Pipeline Safety TrustSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Pipeline Safety Trust, a non-profit watchdog organization, supports the proposed rule but suggests specific language revisions to clarify the definition of "replacement" and the term "reassessment." They argue that the rule should require full replacement of a service line to qualify for an exemption to ensure public safety and prevent incidents caused by partially replaced corroded lines.
Read comment → - Jul 17, 2025Pipeline Safety TrustSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Erin Sutherland of the Pipeline Safety Trust, a nonprofit watchdog organization, is requesting a 30-day extension of the comment period for the proposed action. The organization argues that more time is needed to consult with experts and stakeholders to provide comprehensive and substantive feedback.
Read comment →
