FR–7093–N–02 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Standardization Form for Race and Other Demographic Data Reporting Form—HUD 27061
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- FR–7093–N–02 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Standardization Form for Race and Other Demographic Data Reporting Form—HUD 27061
- Posted
- Jun 12, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 12, 2026 – Aug 12, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-11891
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 23, 2026Comment Submitted by KIMBERLY ARMSTRONGSupportIndividual
Kimberly Armstrong is submitting comments regarding the renewal of Form HUD-27061, arguing that the form needs explicit instructions and automated guardrails to prevent housing managers from incorrectly excluding foster children from household size counts. She advocates for these changes to ensure that families are not improperly disqualified from housing assistance due to administrative errors regarding income and household composition.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Comment Submitted by KIMBERLY ARMSTRONGSupportIndividual
Kimberly Armstrong argues that HUD should update its information collection and eligibility guidance to explicitly decouple household size from income calculations. She advocates for ensuring that foster and adoptive children are always counted as household members to prevent families from being wrongly disqualified from affordable housing programs.
Read comment → - Jul 6, 2026Comment Submitted by Nicholas GillOpposeIndividual📎 Attachment
Nicholas Gill, a law student and research assistant, argues that the proposed information collection is flawed because the abstract describes a broader scope (including disability data) than the actual form provides (which only collects race and ethnicity). He requests that HUD either reconcile the abstract to match the form or revise the form to include the promised disability-related data in an aggregate, privacy-tiered format.
Read comment →
