FWS-HQ-MB-2024-0206-0010
Comments
24
Last activity Jul 27, 2026
Deadline
--
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-64%
-64% excluding campaigns
Document

Details

The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.

Analysis

Overview

What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.

Include campaigns
Analyzed 14 of 24 comments
58%· analysis in progress

Stance breakdown

-64%
Net support
Support2Oppose11Other1Not yet analyzed10
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -64% across organic comments.

Who commented

Breakdown by commenter type.

Government
8
Individual
5
Advocacy
1
Not yet analyzed
10

Comments over time

Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.

Jun 29Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27
Support2Oppose11Other1

Support × commenter type

How each type splits across stance.

Support
Oppose
Other
Government
25%
75%
0%
Individual
0%
100%
0%
Advocacy
0%
0%
100%

Issues raised

The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.

Position map

Who stands where on each issue?

Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.

Arizona Game and Fish Department
GovernmentOppose
3-year constraint on hunting authorizations
California Waterfowl Association
AdvocacyOther
3-year constraint on hunting authorizations
Idaho Department of Fish and Game
GovernmentOppose
3-year constraint on hunting authorizations
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
GovernmentOppose
3-year constraint on hunting authorizations
Comments

Explorer

Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.