Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Gulf South Pipeline Co., LLC; Texas Gas Transmission, LLC; Proposed Kosciusko Junction Pipeline Project
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Gulf South Pipeline Co., LLC; Texas Gas Transmission, LLC; Proposed Kosciusko Junction Pipeline Project
- Posted
- Jul 29, 2026
- Comment period
- Jul 29, 2026 – ?
- FR Doc
- 2026-15287
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Issues are identified as comment analysis progresses — nothing tagged on this document yet.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 2, 2026Climate Center for Energy and Environmental JusticeAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- May 26, 2026Climate Center for Energy and Environmental JusticeAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- May 26, 2026Deep South Center for Environmental JusticeOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Deep South Center for Environmental Justice opposes the Kosciusko Junction Pipeline Project, arguing that the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) fails to adequately assess environmental impacts, public health risks, and disproportionate burdens on marginalized communities. They request that the Commission deny the application or, if approved, require significant reductions in capacity and mitigation measures such as compressor electrification.
Read comment → - May 26, 2026Center for Constitutional RightsOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) opposes the Kosciusko Junction Pipeline Project (KJPP) due to its significant risks to the health, safety, and cultural well-being of Black and other marginalized communities in Mississippi. They argue the project poses environmental hazards, lacks a verifiable need, and contributes to climate change, urging FERC to deny approval.
Read comment → - May 26, 2026Sierra ClubAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- May 26, 2026National Black Environmental Justice NetworkOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The National Black Environmental Justice Network (NBEJN) opposes the current Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Kosciusko Junction Pipeline Project, arguing it fails to meet NEPA standards. They request that FERC improve public accessibility to documents, complete cultural resource consultations (specifically with the Choctaw Nation), and provide more accurate technical data regarding waterbody crossings and air quality.
Read comment → - May 22, 2026Cellular South, Inc. dba C SpireSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
C Spire, a Mississippi-based wireless telecommunications carrier, submits comments requesting specific protections for its 121 network assets within the Project's area of effect. They argue for the inclusion of wireless infrastructure as a distinct utility class in the EIS, requesting enhanced pre-construction notification, mandatory hand-digging for fiber routes, and specific restoration protocols for accidental damage.
Read comment → - May 21, 2026Department of the Interior - OEPCOtherGovernment📎 Attachment
The Department of the Interior reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Kosciusko Junction Pipeline Project and stated that it has no comments at this time.
Read comment → - May 18, 2026UNITED STATES CONGRESSOpposeGovernment📎 Attachment
Representative Bennie G. Thompson expresses serious concerns regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Kosciusko Junction Pipeline Project. He argues that the project fails to provide a meaningful analysis of local economic benefits, threatens to depress local wages by importing out-of-state labor, and improperly excludes a necessary environmental justice analysis.
Read comment → - May 13, 2026Choctaw Nation of OklahomaSupportGovernment📎 Attachment
The Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma is requesting an extension to review the cultural resources survey for the Kosciusko Junction Pipeline Project due to the large amount of data involved. They also request that the Section 106 review be completed before the final construction permit is issued.
Read comment →
