Environmental Assessments; Availability, etc.: Constitution Pipeline and Wright Interconnect Projects; Constitution Pipeline Co., LLC, Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.

Boilermakers Local 5, a labor union representing skilled building trades workers in New York, supports the Constitution Pipeline Project. They argue that the project is necessary for energy reliability and affordability, while also providing significant job opportunities and economic benefits for the region.

The International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Local 15, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D, 15G, & 15H supports the Constitution Pipeline Project. They argue that the project is necessary for energy reliability and affordability in New York, while also providing significant job opportunities and training for skilled building trades workers.

UA Local 7 Plumbers and Steamfitters supports the Constitution Pipeline Project, arguing that it is necessary to address natural gas supply constraints, ensure energy reliability, and provide family-sustaining jobs for building trades workers. They emphasize that the project will generate economic benefits and tax revenues while supporting the transition to cleaner energy sources.

Plumbers & Steamfitters UA Local 81 supports the Constitution Pipeline Project, arguing that it is necessary for energy affordability, reliability, and system resilience in New York. The union emphasizes that the project will create family-sustaining jobs for their members and provide significant economic benefits to local communities.

The New York State Building & Construction Trades Council supports the Constitution Pipeline Project, arguing that it addresses regional energy reliability and affordability while providing significant job opportunities for unionized construction workers. They emphasize the project's role in supporting the local economy and maintaining a stable energy transition.

Otsego 2000, an environmental and historic preservation nonprofit, opposes the Constitution Pipeline project due to its potential damage to the region's pristine forests, agricultural lands, and historic resources. They urge FERC to expand the environmental review to include the impacts of foreseeable AI data center development and natural gas power plants.

The provided comment text contains only XML metadata for a Word document and does not include any actual text or arguments. No position or identity can be determined from the input.

The Delaware County Department of Planning, Parks and Watershed Affairs is submitting comments on behalf of the Delaware County Board of Supervisors regarding the Constitution Pipeline project. While they express significant concerns regarding agricultural impacts, water resources, and road safety, they are providing specific mitigation requirements and requesting additional public meetings to ensure a complete review.

The Town of Roseboom is submitting a comment expressing concern that the proposed pipeline and associated infrastructure will negatively impact their rural community's character and economy. They argue that the current scoping comment period is too short for a municipality to complete the necessary internal review and voting processes.

The Holleran Family, represented by legal counsel, opposes the proposed pipeline project because the application relies on outdated studies and fails to address significant environmental changes and project needs. They argue that the Commission should dismiss the application and require the company to conduct current surveys and provide a credible demonstration of project need.