Azodicarbonamide (ADA); Request for Information
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Azodicarbonamide (ADA); Request for Information
- Posted
- May 13, 2026
- Comment period
- May 13, 2026 – Jul 14, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09508
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Issues are identified as comment analysis progresses — nothing tagged on this document yet.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 13, 2026Comment from American Bakers AssociationAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 13, 2026Comment from Association for Sustainable Food Safety (ASFS)Analysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 13, 2026Comment from CSPIAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 13, 2026Comment from EWGAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 13, 2026Comment from Consumer Brands AssociationAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 9, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter, a registered nurse and consumer, supports the FDA's decision to reassess azodicarbonamide (ADA). They urge the agency to conduct a rigorous evaluation of ADA and its decomposition products, considering cumulative exposure and the availability of safer alternatives.
Read comment → - Jul 8, 2026Comment from James Di NasoSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the FDA conducting stronger, more frequent, and science-based reviews of Azodicarbonamide (ADA) and other food additives. They specifically advocate for testing chemicals in combination rather than in isolation and call for increased transparency through updated food labeling statutes.
Read comment →