Clinical Decision Support Software Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Clinical Decision Support Software Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff
- Posted
- Jan 30, 2026
- Comment period
- Jan 30, 2026 – ?
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Patient-facing software classification |
|---|
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 1, 2026Comment from Combination Products CoalitionSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The Combination Products Coalition (CPC), representing drug, biological, and medical device manufacturers, supports the FDA's guidance but proposes specific revisions to clarify regulatory boundaries. They argue for clearer exemptions for patient-facing software, more flexible interpretations of "clinically appropriate" and "time-critical" criteria, and the inclusion of AI/ML-specific validation methods to reduce regulatory burden and promote innovation.
Read comment → - Apr 23, 2026Comment from Medical Information Technology Inc (MEDITECH)OpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
MEDITECH, a medical information technology company, opposes the proposed guidance because it classifies foundational EHR functions as regulated medical devices. They argue that this creates an excessive regulatory burden that could lead to alert fatigue, increase documentation requirements, and hinder the operational efficiency of healthcare delivery.
Read comment →
