The Petroleum Alliance of Oklahoma
Trade associationSupport
Nepa procedure updates
EPA-HQ-OA-2025-1080-0001
Comments
47
Last activity Jul 28, 2026
Deadline
--
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-26%
-26% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Analyzed 19 of 47 comments
40%· analysis in progress
Stance breakdown
-26%
Net support
Support5Oppose10Other4Not yet analyzed28
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -26% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Business
1
Individual
11
Trade association
3
Advocacy
4
Not yet analyzed
28
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Jun 29Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27
Support5Oppose10Other4
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
18%
64%
18%
Advocacy
25%
50%
25%
Trade association
67%
0%
33%
Business
0%
100%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Nepa procedure updates |
|---|---|
The Petroleum Alliance of Oklahoma Trade associationSupport The Petroleum Alliance of Oklahoma, a trade association representing the oil and gas industry, supports the proposed rul |
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jul 28, 2026Comment submitted by Prime Mover InstituteAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Comment submitted by Miami-Dade County, Department of Environmental Resources ManagementAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Comment submitted by Food & Water Watch (FWW)Analysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Comment submitted by U.S. Chamber of Commerce et al.Analysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Comment submitted by Coalition of Local GovernmentsAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Comment submitted by Stephen BuckleyOtherIndividual
Stephen Buckley, a former federal environmental official, submitted a comment regarding NEPA implementation. He notes that he is providing his comments with the assistance of an AI tool.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Comment submitted by United South and Eastern Tribes Sovereignty Protection Fund (USET SPF)Analysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Comment submitted by Rob Bonta, Attorney General, State of California et al.Analysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Comment submitted by Water Protector Legal Collective (WPLC)OpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Water Protector Legal Collective (WPLC), an Indigenous-led legal non-profit, opposes the EPA's proposed rule to update NEPA procedures. They argue the rule narrows the scope of environmental reviews, weakens mandatory Tribal consultation, and fails to adequately analyze the negative impacts on Tribal sovereignty and Treaty-protected resources.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Comment submitted by Our Children's TrustAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →