2026-09930
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- 2026-09930
- Posted
- May 18, 2026
- Comment period
- May 18, 2026 – Jul 18, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09930
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 16, 2026The Dine Native American Church of New MexicoAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 16, 2026Council of peyote way of life coalitionAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 17, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-09930Analysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 17, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-09930Analysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 17, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed action on the grounds that peyote is a sacred medicine for First Nations and should be protected from corporate exploitation and pharmaceutical synthesis. They argue that the plant should remain a religious sacrament rather than a source of economic profit.
Read comment → - Jul 17, 2026Mateo KreshaOpposeIndividual
The commenter urges the DEA to deny Benuvia Operations, LLC.'s application to manufacture mescaline. They argue that commercial manufacturing poses a threat to human health, violates the American Indian Freedom of Religion Act, and endangers the conservation of the Peyote plant.
Read comment → - Jul 17, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 17, 2026Anonymous AnonymousAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 17, 2026Angela BeersAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 17, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →