Comment on FR Doc # 2026-09161

Sandra ClarkOpposeIndividual
Summary: The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it would allow individuals to transport deadly firearms across state lines without notice to law enforcement. They express concern that the rule would endanger communities and law enforcement officers while undermining state-level restrictions on firearm transport.
I write to express my strong opposition to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ “Instate Transport and Temporary Export of National Firearms Act” notice of proposed rulemaking (RIN 1140-AA89). At a time of ongoing mass shootings and increased political violence, the ATF should not be trying to skirt state laws and allow people to travel across state lines with especially deadly firearms with no notice to federal and state law enforcement. These changes would put not only communities at risk, but also endanger law enforcement—routine traffic stops could easily turn deadly. There are multiple examples of people traveling across multiple states with the goal of doing harm, and the ATF should be trying to stop this from happening, not making it easier. We have enough crime in our area that we don't need people transporting weapons of any kind into our community in order to commit crimes and especially mass murder. The people of Pennsylvania chose not to allow transport across state lines and that should be honored by EVERY state and DC. For the safety of communities and our law enforcement, I urge you to not move forward with this dangerous rule. Thank you,

View on Regulations.gov