MM22 Comment Submitted by Anonymous

AnonymousOpposeIndividual
Summary: The commenter opposes the proposed rule restricting work eligibility for documented immigrants, arguing it will cause labor shortages in critical sectors and create economic harm. They contend that documented immigrants contribute significantly to the economy and that the new restrictions are redundant and costly.
I am writing to strongly oppose the proposed rule restricting work eligibility for documented immigrants. This policy would create significant economic and social harm without achieving its stated objectives. Documented immigrants represent a substantial portion of the labor force across many critical sectors such as healthcare, construction, agriculture, and technology. Restricting their work authorization would create immediate labor shortages in industries already facing workforce challenges. Research consistently shows that immigrants with work authorization contribute more in taxes than they use in services. The rule creates administrative complexity and compliance burdens on employers without clear enforcement mechanisms. Documented status already involves background checks and vetting; further restrictions are redundant and costly to administer. These individuals have already undergone legal processes to secure documentation. Restricting their fundamental right to work breaches the social contract and creates an underclass vulnerable to exploitation, depressing wages industry-wide. Why would our country grant them access to live here then curb their ability to support themselves and contribute to our economy. It makes no sense. I strongly urge rejection of this proposal. Maintaining work authorization for documented immigrants serves economic, fiscal, and humanitarian interests.

View on Regulations.gov