Comment Submitted by Anonymous
AnonymousOpposeIndividual
Summary: The commenter identifies several technical flaws, inconsistencies, and missing information in the proposed revision of the Immigrant Petition for the Gold Card Program. They argue that the form contains sloppy typos, incorrect cross-references, and lacks clarity on critical issues such as fund traceability, derivative processing, and corporate entity identification.
1.Part 1, unexplained, unsubstantiated questions (e.g., commemorative plaque requests and foreign government ownership/address)
2.Part 2, no clear field or instructions for identifying the corporate entity supplying funds.
3.Part 3, allows transfer of funds from a previously approved petition without explanation of how that would work or what the legal basis there is for using one person's visa number in one year for another person in a different year.
4.Instructions contain incorrect and inconsistent internal cross‑references, particularly Part 3.
5.Part 4, conflicting guidance regarding consular process v. adjustment pathways.
6.Part 5 and 6 lacks explanation on derivative processing.
7.Cryptocurrency section identifies broad documentation categories but omits clear traceability standards.
8.Part 7, admissibility questions typically resolved at the visa or adjustment stage, without relevance to the petition stage.
9. Omits basic information about the petitioner (e.g., physical address, business classification) and the beneficiary’s role.
10. sloppy typos throughout the form and instructions.